Covid Rapid antigen Tests - the semi technical low down

Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Posts
14,581
A lot of the information below are derived from the WHO paper on RAT testing - download the paper


There are various ways to test for the presence of Covid viral infection.
1) Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT).
- Also called the PCR (real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction)
- Expensive, requires expensive diagnostic lab equipment and reagents, multistep procedure
- Slow to get results
- Highly accurate (with certain caveats)

2) Ag-RDT: Antigen rapid detection test / RAT: rapid antigen tests: LFT lateral flow tests - they all mean the same style of test.
- These are accessible, cheaper, rapid tests compared to PCR and can also be reliable and accurate (with certain caveats)
-Most are point of care tests (means you can test where you stand)) and do not require laboratory processing. (some RATs do)

3) Covid antibody testing
Primarily blood test, but this is a historical test looking for past infections, so is of no use in the diagnoses of present Covid infection

Biostatistical intepretation and explanatory terms
1) Sensitivity
- the % of cases which are truly positive that are detected as positive by RAT

2) Specificity

- the % of cases that are truly negative that are detected as negative by RAT

3) Positive predictive value

- the probability that subjects with a positive RAT test truly have the disease

4) Negative predictive value

- the probability that subjects with a negative RAT test do not have the disease.

5) False positive

- an error in which a a RAT test reports a positive result in an individual who is truly negative

6) False negative

- an error in which a RAT test reports a negative result in an individual who is truly positive

See Annex page 17-20 of the attached WHO paper on RAT testing to see examples of the numbers of each of the above category. Pay particular attention to the false positive and false negative.




Accuracy limitation of RAT
WHO recommends RATS with a minimum performance requirements of:
>80% sensitivity
>97% specificity

By comparison the PCR test:
>95% sensitivity
>99.9 specificity

It is important to note that in the asymptomatic population the tests are less accurate:
Less than 50% sensitivity
>97% specificity

RAT perform best in:
People with high viral load, early in the course of the infection
Very reliable where there in ongiong Covid transmission and a Covid prevalence or test positivity rate of >5%

Where there is no or low transmission, the positive predictive value of RAT will be low - it higher false positive rate
In these cases testing should only be done for symptomatic individuals or those asymptomatic individuals at high risk of infection
There is no recommendations for RAT to be used indiscriminately. In fact indiscriminate use lowers positive predictive value of these tests.

Training is recommended for the proper use of RAT
Strict storage and operational temperature requirements are also required.
With summer in Australia, it will not be unusual for a RAT test to sit in the heat inside a parked car.

When should RATS be used
To detect Covid infections in:
- symptomatic individuals early in the course of an illness (less than 5 days after the onset of symptoms)
- the use of RATs later than 7 days after symptoms increases the likelihood of false negatives.
- asymptomatic Individuals at high risk of infection - eg those deemed to be a close contact, health care workers
- in settings where PCR tests are difficult to access
- in negative RATs test in the previous 48hrs but accounting for the epidemiological context, clinical history and presentation

What do the RAT detect
- There are synthetic antibodies on the RAT testing surface which bind to various Covid proteins (the so called antigen) produced by the replicating virus in respiratory secretions/oral saliva.
- covid proteins are produced in different concentrations - nucleocapsid proteins are produced at the highest level while spike proteins are lowest
- Note they do not detect the virus itself.
- mutations might affect test accuracy (spike vs nucleocapsid)
- they do not necessarily detect seroconversion from spike protein vaccinations

Issue of quality testing
- test design : insufficient antibody quantity or affinity to the target antigen (the protein it is testing for)
- cross reactivity with other substances
- heat and humidity (Ill bet that many tests will be sitting in a hot car in summer, or in a handbag in a similar environment)
- adequate sampling
- proper execution of test procedure


RAT Covid testing in asymptomatic populations
The prevalence of Covid in the asymptomatic population is extremely low in the overall tested population.
This meta analysis study suggested 0.25%
However 40% individuals with a confirmed test were asymptomatic
Viral loads are highest very early on in the covid infection - often when the individual is at the cusp of becoming symptomatic.
This means that asymptomatic testing needs to be targeted

RAT Covid testing in asymptomatic individuals who are close contacts of confirmed covid cases
Recommended
If negative may need repeat RAT testing and or PCR testing.

RAT Covid testing in Individuals with symptoms of covid and in the first 5-7 days since onset of symptoms
Yes
If negative, a confirmation RAT test could be performed within 48hrs
A confirmation PCR test should also be done.

RAT Covid testing in the Workplace
Again the general recommendation is testing is recommended in environments where there is a high risk of exposure.

Mass RAT Covid testing
Mass indiscriminate testing of aymptomatic individuals is not recommended


Here are the current TGA approved RAT tests
They are approved in the sense that they conform to the >80% sensitivity and >97% specificity
Again note that the sensitivity in asymptomatic individuals likely to be much lower.
Recommended Storage temperature of RAT tests is generally 1-30C. Especially important with our hot summer above 30% in many places

The intepretation of a positive or negative results depends on various factors including:
- test specificity and sensitivity
- the prevalence of covid in the community based on surveillance
- symptom status of the individual
- clinical context of the individual eg close contact

1) negative tests should be repeated in 24-48hrs depending on the above - but especially if there is high index of suspicion.
If also symptomatic please get a PCR test

2) NSW Health recommends a positive RAT test should be followed up with a confirmatory PCR test but do not get to PCR testing site by public transport/rideshare
- NSW Health can provide Covid Home testing under certain circumstances
- one of the potential problems of a positive RAT is that some will not doa confirmatory PCR and will be effectively hidden from the Health Dept.

With an understanding of the above synopsis, please read the attached pdf in the TGA list in order to see which one is best for you.
A general reminder it is the AFF way to read and in some circumstances, exploit the fine print!!
 
Last edited:
The UK Orient Gene product appears very good and has a quoted accuracy:

But not avail in AU

Sensitivity 96%
Specificity 99%

I don’t know what the sensitivity of the RAT is in the asymptomatic individual but generally as posted above can be dramatically lower

Personally I would have preferred one or two RATs at the higher end of accuracy scale like this one rather than a smorgasbord that the TGA has approved
 
Last edited:
There are only 5 TGA approved RAT which are in the “very high sensitivity” category

4 involve nasal swab and 1 oral saliva.

I personally would only get one of these 5

(I have no commercial interests in RATS)
 
There are only 5 TGA approved RAT which are in the “very high sensitivity” category

4 involve nasal swab and 1 oral saliva.

I personally would only get one of these 5

(I have no commercial interests in RATS)
Which one?
 
Which one?
Ahhh!!! I’ve been waiting for this question…
It’s a bit like asking which J seat is better on an airplane.😀

There are 3 places to get a sample for a Covid test - whether PCR or RAT

Nasal
Nasopharyngeal
Oral

I don’t know which sampling site is best and the papers I’ve read are not convincing for one or another. Maybe emulate what happens at the Covid PCR testing sites??

Accuracy of a test depends on
(A) individual viral load
(B) sampling
(C) test procedure accuracy
(D) characteristics of the test itself.
(E) confounding factors, cross reactivity

The UK Orient Gene RAT is a nasal swab test and if you add that to the other 5 from the TGA very high sensitivity list,

Then do Eee-nee-meenee-minee-mo and pick one at random, there is more chance of a nasal swab test.

I think whatever test is chosen, it is very important to do it correctly, adhere to the recommended procedure and not keep the test in your car in the summer heat
 
Last edited:
I have just stocked up on two brands on the TGA v high sensitivity list of 5 (one nasal and one saliva ). Only two brands that I could buy (online AND available) - packs of 20 work out about $10 per test. I figure once RAT is the way to go for work/health contacts—demand will increase and harder to get.
 
Supply will follow though, but I'm sure it will take a couple of weeks to catch up.

I hadn't thought about buying any as I get swabbed each day at work (and I seem to work every day at the moment...) but the past few days has me thinking if I see any in stock at the supermarket I probably should get a pack of 5 just to have. What is the shelf life of them?
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Exp date 10/22 for the ones I got at pharmac_ and supermarket (both of which were high sensitivity not v high sensitivity). Plenty of Hough brand at IGA locally where I’m on hol regional west Vic which is also brand sold by my local pharmac_ in CBD Melb
 
I have checked in on the website for the nasal tests I bought (it’s in WA). Still have box 20 tests ($200) but fives and singles all sold out. Their website states they sell in Woolworths but I have never seen them stocked at my local. PS they are Alltest so first on TGA list in alphabetical order !
FWIW - if choosing saliva tests lollipop style far easier to use as direct oral swab v spit in tube (some high sensitivity are); latter is messy (I found) and quite hard to produce require amount. Lollipop is the last oral v high sens test on TGA
 
Last edited:
I have checked in on the website for the nasal tests I bought (it’s in WA). Still have box 20 tests ($200) but fives and singles all sold out. Their website states they sell in Woolworths but I have never seen them stocked at my local. PS they are Alltest so first on TGA list in alphabetical order !
FWIW - if choosing saliva tests lollipop style far easier to use as direct oral swab v spit in tube (some high sensitivity are); latter is messy (I found) and quite hard to produce require amount. Lollipop is the last oral v high sens test on TGA
I took ages to generate the required 2ml on my UK arrival saliva PCR
 
Seven news (7NEWS) noting a new website that apparently crowdsource info on where to find a RAT

findarat.com.au

Second point is a question. Some friend were mentioning that some RAT cannot detect Omicron. Does anyone know which brands fall in this category? I’m guessing none are currently on TGA list.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: VPS
I will look at TGA Post Testing RAT results. 20/12/21 update did not address OmicRon (But all other variants)
I am checking to see if this has been since updated.

This is separate to the TGA site which contains all RAT approved - already addressed in prior posts by @Quickstatus ….being from a medical background I too recommend purchase v high sensitivity tests (of which five are listed).
 
Back
Top