BA has been banned from overflying Russia, is QF next?

The few latest BA11/BA12 flights already take a south path, avoiding Russia air space normally used. Can guess Qantas will do the same if needed.
It would quite entertaining hearing Scot banning Russia's airplan from using Australian's airspace though.

1645838772542.png
 
Last edited:
QF2, QF9 and QF10 are flying over Russia as well. It’s both directions of the flights between DRW and LHR.

If they have to take a longer route they will need to carry more fuel and offset this by saving weight in other areas e.g. passengers and/or cargo.
 
The other option (from 3 March) is to accelerate the return to PER, as from memory PER-LHR does not go over Russia.
 
QF2, QF9 and QF10 are flying over Russia as well. It’s both directions of the flights between DRW and LHR.

If they have to take a longer route they will need to carry more fuel and offset this by saving weight in other areas e.g. passengers and/or cargo.
Looking at GCMAP, PER-LHR is 9,009 miles while tracking DRW-LHR passing over Turkey is 8,958 miles. Not sure if other factors like wind are very different on both routing, but as absolute distance it's shorter.

Screenshot_20220226-134309_Chrome.jpg
 
For PER-LHR I think in one of the directions due to wind factors they had to have a lighter load. The 787 is used for shorter routes as well so it needs to have enough seats to make e.g. flights to LAX work.

Lengthening the distance to travel and reducing the number of passengers does impact the economics of the flight. It may still be profitable, but probably not as profitable to have a longer DRW-LHR flight than currently.

DRW has a smaller population than PER though so there’s probably less people booking just the DRW-LHR leg than would book just PER-LHR.
 
Paying overflight fees may become complicated though if Russian banks are eventually banned from using SWIFT. But I'm sure there's a way, Iran seems to get paid overflight fees even with all the sanctions, but maybe not in USD.
 
If BA (or VS) were currently flying to places like Tokyo, Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong or Seoul, this would severely affect their operations. But I don't think either of these airlines are currently flying to any of those places anyway - at least, not with passengers. Flights to Bangkok or Singapore aren't as affected as they fly further south anyway.

I think the airline that would be most "screwed" if Russian overflights were banned would be Finnair.
 
So how would BA fly to Japan now ?
When I said it wouldn’t have any effect, I meant any restrictions our government might impose. It makes a huge difference to anything to Korea or Japan. Perhaps Alaska will become the new Singapore/Dubai.
 
JB - what discretion would a Captain have in situations like this? While QF would never knowingly fly over dangerous territory this is a unique situation - as mentioned on the other thread Russia could conceivably force a western aircraft to land and check/confirm paperwork etc as an act of intimidation.

Does a QF Captain have the authority to reject the proposed flight plan, and in this example, route the QF1 over the middle east etc? Rather than flying over Russia? Extra flight time, fuel etc etc - would their be a "please explain" from senior management?
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I wonder if any pax have got nervous and swapped to another airline?
I doubt 99% would even know....until they looked at the moving map.
 
I think the airline that would be most "screwed" if Russian overflights were banned would be Finnair.

They'd be finnished... well not really. AY only really flies to NRT, KIX and ICN at the moment and they're mostly not daily.
 
Back
Top