Ask The Pilot

  • Thread starter Thread starter NM
  • Start date Start date
  • Featured
A very little one. In side elevation runway 34 has a hump which rises to a maximum of 2.33m above the threshold and 4.42m above foxtrot
I guess that might be noticeable from a lower coughpit, but the aircraft I flew were probably high enough to not notice. On the other hand Darwin and Manchester.....
 
I guess that might be noticeable from a lower coughpit, but the aircraft I flew were probably high enough to not notice. On the other hand Darwin and Manchester.....

It’s caused issues in the past when a tug crosses the 16 threshold unauthorised with a 34 departure!
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

That was a very recent change from one operator, increases Wet Rwy Xwind for T/O.

Ours are a bit different. Not doubting the validity of yours, it’s interesting to see the subtle differences between operators. Even if they fly the same aircraft in the same country!
Yep, you’re right. I had to ask my mates over at QF and turns out there is a few parameters with flap and CG to allow you to increase the wet take off crosswind limit by 5kts.

I remember they did something to it to get out of ports before cyclone Alfred hit but didn’t realise on the flap or CG part. I thought ours was also going to get relaxed by 5kts too (up to 30kts total) on a wet runway, but that never happened.

I wonder how long it’ll take before we follow suit.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top