Ask The Pilot

I know both RDC and JB and have to say I believe they, and a lot of others, would probably do a better job than the current board.
I am not commenting or suggesting that either of them or anyone in particular are or are not the best for the job(s).
 
Last edited:
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Next week actually. It’s my standard cyclic which is in the MAX sim. First time “flying it” since the differences course I did a couple of years ago. So a bit of study required to go through all that again.
could they throw something nasty at you first off, or do they allow you to get your feet under the desk first?
 
Not sure if the video will be viewable for those not in NZ, but I thought JB might enjoy this view of an A380 landing with a cross wind.
The A380 was quite nice to handle in the crosswind, especially gusty ones, as the FBW would do a lot of the work in cancelling the gusts. But, you were supposed to get rid of all of the drift prior to touchdown, and 5º is the absolute maximum. In this case I'm not sure that he's achieved that. Touchdown would have been about 1-1.5 seconds before the spoilers rise, and at that point there looks to be more that 5º. The 747 on the other hand, you could land with all of the drift intact, which in a limiting crosswind would be about 15º (which is about what the 380 has early in the video). On the other hand, any landing that doesn't require a rebuild is probably acceptable.
 
And writing a book opens you up to people like me, who can read between the lines.

Perhaps those not in the industry might see it as people having a bit of tall poppy however I did have the great displeasure of reading that book. On the other hand, Kevin Sullivan’s No Man’s Land I consider to be a wonderful book and a must read for anyone who wants to fly planes for a living.

It’s sad that Kevin’s career eventually ended the way it did, another example of how unfair life can be.
 
could they throw something nasty at you first off, or do they allow you to get your feet under the desk first?
The profile itself doesn’t call for anything too bad. There’s a TCAS event on climb out of Sydney followed by an ice crystal icing event leading to an engine failure in cruise. So I’ll have about 15mins to get my bearings again before the rest of the box ticking exercises come.
 
In this case I'm not sure that he's achieved that. Touchdown would have been about 1-1.5 seconds before the spoilers rise, and at that point there looks to be more that 5º.
What are the issues that could arise should one touchdown will more than 5 degrees?
 
What are the issues that could arise should one touchdown will more than 5 degrees?
They're engineering issues. You're applying a large side load to the gear, in excess of what you're supposed to. It's unlikely to break but you're reducing its life.

Dynamically, it's a very stable gear configuration. Because the body gear is aft of the wing gear, as long as you don't allow the nose gear to touchdown, it applies a torque that tends to straighten the aircraft with respect to the runway. Boeing built the 747 gear a bit stronger, and let you use that torque as a normal way of straightening up after a crosswind landing. It was still better to do so before landing, but it was another option.
 
The A380 was quite nice to handle in the crosswind, especially gusty ones, as the FBW would do a lot of the work in cancelling the gusts. But, you were supposed to get rid of all of the drift prior to touchdown, and 5º is the absolute maximum. In this case I'm not sure that he's achieved that.
Yesterday (or was it the day before - jetlagged like you wouldn't believe) I recorded the tail cam view of our landing at Singapore on QF2.

From about 1 minute onwards shows the landing.


As a seasoned pax, my vote for "plane of the century" has to be the A380. We did MEL-LAX and LAX-MEL on the B787, MEL-SIN and SIN-MEL on the B787. The A380 SIN-LHR-SIN was far and away the most comfortable and quieter of the two.

This was in premium economy on both aircraft. VA's 777 PE was pretty good too, but that service to the US is no longer offered.

Oh, the LHR-SIN crew was Capt Peter Ellis and FO Suzy Someone. They didn't mention the SOs.
 
Very curious to hear your thoughts on this one JB and AV...
My initial thoughts are that the rotation was started way too early. It must have been picked up and hence the nose drop again. Perhaps TOGA was then pushed and that's what created the steep climb once the aircraft got airborne. It could also have meant incorrect speeds were input into the FMC.
 
Not a pilots' question, so apologies if inappropriate post, but thought this compilation might be of interest - not much commercial, but a deal of military and GA skillful (in my eyes!) flying and some amazing helicopter flying, which may appeal to @straitman (eg 4:30, 8:50, 11:15, 12:12 )

It will play but apologies for opening ad)

 
Oh, the LHR-SIN crew was Capt Peter Ellis and FO Suzy Someone. They didn't mention the SOs.
Well, I don't know Suzy, but Peter has done many of my 380 sims. Nice bloke, and excellent instructor. It's nice to hear that he wasn't another of the COVID retirements.

Looking at the video, I'd be prepared to bet that it's all manual, simply because the nose gear has been displaced slightly upwind during the approach. The autopilot would have put it exactly on, but manually it was always better to be upwind.

I'll admit that it took me about a year to come to terms with the 380 (i.e. Airbus), and about 2 years to love it. But I ended my career with it being my favourite.
 
Sponsored Post

Struggling to use your Frequent Flyer Points?

Frequent Flyer Concierge takes the hard work out of finding award availability and redeeming your frequent flyer or credit card points for flights.

Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, the Frequent Flyer Concierge team at Frequent Flyer Concierge will help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

Very curious to hear your thoughts on this one JB and AV...
I looked at the weather that was present at the time, and it wasn't nasty. About 10 knots, but it was switching around from a slight tailwind, to a headwind. The rotation rate looks about normal. The only reason for pitch down is to stop a tail strike (which doesn't seem to be the case initially) or to counter a loss of airspeed. The rapid climb afterwards would make sense with TOGA. Wrong numbers? Perhaps, but you wouldn't need TOGA or the rapid climb. I don't know that I can give a definite answer here.
 
Last edited:
Not a pilots' question, so apologies if inappropriate post, but thought this compilation might be of interest - not much commercial, but a deal of military and GA skillful (in my eyes!) flying and some amazing helicopter flying,...

I like the St Elmo's at 15:15. I've had that view many times.
 
The autopilot would have put it exactly on, but manually it was always better to be upwind.
I'm still in awe of the tech behind it all. That the aircraft descended out of the fog/clouds on our approach into LHR and going by the tail cam, the runway centre line was spot on dead centre on the aircraft.

I have trouble finding my street corner in the fog, let alone seeing what modern aircraft can do.

Anyway, this begs another question: what ILS tech is available to aircraft at Melbourne? Everytime it's foggy we hear of cancelled flights, diversions and so on.

Why can't they do the same with MEL as they do in London, New York and so on?
 
I'm still in awe of the tech behind it all. That the aircraft descended out of the fog/clouds on our approach into LHR and going by the tail cam, the runway centre line was spot on dead centre on the aircraft.

I have trouble finding my street corner in the fog, let alone seeing what modern aircraft can do.

Anyway, this begs another question: what ILS tech is available to aircraft at Melbourne? Everytime it's foggy we hear of cancelled flights, diversions and so on.

Why can't they do the same with MEL as they do in London, New York and so on?
Apparently Melbourne and Perth Airports are the 2 airports in Australia equipped with Category 111B Autoland systems but only on one runway each. I think this is the same system in use at Heathrow, JFK and Changi.

 

Enhance your AFF viewing experience!!

From just $6 we'll remove all advertisements so that you can enjoy a cleaner and uninterupted viewing experience.

And you'll be supporting us so that we can continue to provide this valuable resource :)


Sample AFF with no advertisements? More..
Back
Top