A330 Reliability Issues

Heard that QF36 operated by VH-EBA diverted to ADL this morning
Interesting flight path. It has descended from F350 early in the flight, and then maintained F310 for the vast majority of the remainder. It's generally not hard to get a climb in that part of the world, so that would imply that they didn't want it. It's not an emergency, as they had a number of alternatives, and have seemingly held until the end of the curfew (by my maths) at Adelaide.
 
Interesting flight path. It has descended from F350 early in the flight, and then maintained F310 for the vast majority of the remainder. It's generally not hard to get a climb in that part of the world, so that would imply that they didn't want it. It's not an emergency, as they had a number of alternatives, and have seemingly held until the end of the curfew (by my maths) at Adelaide.
Appreciate it's all speculation, but given what you're seeing there, can you think of any particular explanation for that? If there's a technical issue that wasn't serious enough to consider an earlier alternative, my uninformed brain wonders why you couldn't just carry on to MEL given it's not much further along?
 
According to Melbourne's Jacquie Felgate Instagram post from a passenger, "cabin pressuriser broke midflight".
I will leave this to the experts to evaluate.
I'm no expert on the topic, but if the cabin pressurisation system broke, then I'd imagine they'd be needing to descend to an altitude well below 31K feet and would be diverting somewhere long before ADL...?
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Am I correct in assuming that the lower flight level results in an increased fuel burn and thus unable to reach Melbourne?
Being unable to climb would result in a greater fuel burn, though it would be partially offset by a slower speed (automatically calculated by the FMC). At first glance I'd have expected enough fat in the fuel plan to cover this...perhaps not.
According to Melbourne's Jacquie Felgate Instagram post from a passenger, "cabin pressuriser broke midflight".
I will leave this to the experts to evaluate.

I'm no expert on the topic, but if the cabin pressurisation system broke, then I'd imagine they'd be needing to descend to an altitude well below 31K feet and would be diverting somewhere long before ADL...?
The aircraft would have two airconditioning packs, so the loss of one would not lead to loss of pressurisation. But, it may impose an upper altitude limit. That seems consistent with the altitude that they used.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top