Lear jet crash in Florida

A considered early analysis from an understandably emotional Captain Steeve


I have to say, the young woman copiloting died an absolute hero. She was 20 years old, got licence at 17 and living her dream. Despite everything going on, and with the plane in a near vertical dive, she kept ATC informed every step of the way. She made her callsign on every single call.

And an excellent comment from NASA chief Jared Isaacman
 
More speculation, somewhat ill informed, it was the same plane not the same crew that got caught out earlier I believe. If it’s relevant it will be in the forthcoming report along with actual details of the crew etc.
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

This gives creedence to the reports that parts of the T-tail were missing before impact.

Due to overspeed exceeding structural limits?

Or overspeed + pilot input to pitch up = exceeded structural limits?

Did the overspeed also induced a high speed stall or Mach tuck which essentially also disrupted airflow over the horizontal stabiliser whose normal function is to maintain pitch balance?. Making the loss of the horizontal stabiliser a moot issue?
 
Due to overspeed exceeding structural limits?

Or overspeed + pilot input to pitch up = exceeded structural limits?

AFAIK that hasn't been determined yet. Give them time. I'm sure they have some of the best investigators available working on this.

Also it's been mentioned that they believe this particular aircraft wasn't fitted with a flight data recorder but likely had a coughpit voice recorder fitted.

Whether either type of device could survive such an impact vertically into the ground at something like mach 0.8 is another question.
 
Commentary re the co-pilot is way off the mark. The fact that she was 20 does not matter. I know of both an A-4 and an F-111 pilot of that age. Some young people can achieve much.
 
Whether either type of device could survive such an impact vertically into the ground at something like mach 0.8 is another question.
It could be buried deep in the crater.

The airplane vertical acceleration would be 1G + engine thrust - drag - lift vector (if not a vertical fall)
Gravity acceleration = 9.8ms⁻² = 1G
An object falling in a vacuum (no air resistance) from 37,000 feet at 1G achieves a final speed of 1500 feet/sec (90,000 feet/min) or Mach 1.3
I dont know what the aircraft's final vertical speed is- it is suggested that it was more than 32,000 feet/min
Using Mach 0.8 = 54,000 feet/min

So this aircraft likely final acceleration less than 1G.
My understanding is the CSMU (Crash Survivability Memory Unit) in the CVR are designed to survive acceleration at point of impact of >3000G
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top