They've read the announcement incorrectly. The CEO is on 65% of his normal pay (a 35% pay cut), and the other execs on 85% of their normal pay (a 15% pay cut), all until November.The interesting tidbit in the online articles (eg. theage) is that the senior execs have taken an 85% pay cut whilst the CEO has taken a 65% pay cut.
Shouldn’t it be the other way around?
The interesting tidbit in the online articles (eg. theage) is that the senior execs have taken an 85% pay cut whilst the CEO has taken a 65% pay cut.
Shouldn’t it be the other way around?
Would he have been eligible for JobKeeper?Can't afford to keep a CEO on a 85% pay cut for a while?
Would he have been eligible for JobKeeper?
Job keeper Per employee including managementQF is only out of pocket $500.
Something sounds fishy. Can't afford to keep a CEO on a 85% pay cut for a while? I mean, unless the CEO has another job to walk in to?
Anyhoo - for now they don't need the position. The position may return in 12-18 months time.
They've read the announcement incorrectly. The CEO is on 65% of his normal pay (a 35% pay cut), and the other execs on 85% of their normal pay (a 15% pay cut), all until November.
They've got it badly wrong if that's what they said.. Here is the ASX release: https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20200824/pdf/44ltc3czj3jzv9.pdf
part of its response to the COVID crisis, the Qantas Group ManagementCommittee took three months of zero pay in the last quarter of FY20 and is on reduced pay (65 per cent for the CEO and 85 per cent for other executives) until November 2020.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements