QF1 cancelled because A380 carried coronavirus passenger in F

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm surprised they couldn't use another A380.
Isn't QF35/36 downgrade freeing up a 380?

 
I don’t have a subscription, but perhaps someone can post the full text?

I don't have a subscription either, but the anti-paywall extension for Firefox works a treat:

Qantas cancelled its Wednesday afternoon service from Sydney to London via Singapore to fully clean the A380 aircraft used following confirmation it carried a first class passenger with coronavirus.
Another Qantas flight from Singapore to Sydney, using an A330 was also identified by NSW Health as transporting a man who tested positive for coronavirus.

It is understood cabin crew who had direct contact with the passengers on each flight have been placed into self-isolation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Funny they mention the cabin.
No other report for any other passenger reported to have the virus on another airline mentioned it.
Probably not news worthy if they were in Y 😂
 
If this is the precedent they are going to set there's a lot of pain ahead. I may or may not be bitter having been booked on QF2 ex SIN on Friday night, which this aircraft would have operated....
 
Wow, I was on the morning MEL-LST flight that day. Later that day returning SYD-MEL I was sat next to a Chinese woman who didn’t seem healthy. I asked if could move as a precaution but full flight. Ya never know...
 
Funny they mention the cabin.
No other report for any other passenger reported to have the virus on another airline mentioned it.
Probably not news worthy if they were in Y 😂
They didn’t mention the cabin AFIK. Can’t see the pay walled version but the one I saw at 0700 this morning said the pax was in row 5.
I snorted my Almond latte and posted it on my Facebook group. Was quite an entertaining morning.
Did wonder if perhaps a digit was missing after the 5 😜

EDIT
I wonder if a staffer from Fox is on the group 😂
 
They didn’t mention the cabin AFIK. Can’t see the pay walled version but the one I saw at 0700 this morning said the pax was in row 5.
I snorted my Almond latte and posted it on my Facebook group. Was quite an entertaining morning.
Did wonder if perhaps a digit was missing after the 5 😜

EDIT
I wonder if a staffer from Fox is on the group 😂
It's in post #3
 
A total overreaction in my opinion.... to "clean the cabin properly".... lord oh lordy lord... a can of Glen 20 does the trick
 
The aircraft was VH-OQC - a 28 Feb departure from SIN arriving into SYD on 29 Feb. I trust the Cabin crew are well and their needs are being taken care of. The passenger in question was in F in Row 5. I was on the same flight and still feeling fine and now on my way up to BKK this morning on QF23. There was nothing abnormal about the flight. Typically if there is a medical issue the crew is aware of on arriving into SYD passengers would be requested to remain with their seatbelts fastened until the medical team had boarded and assessed the passenger. From memory the inbound QF2 becomes the outbound QF11 later in the morning so I’m presuming the aircraft would have done to/from LAX and To/from LHR before being grounded.
 
Last edited:
The aircraft was VH-OQC - a 28 Feb departure from SIN arriving into SYD on 29 Feb. I trust the Cabin crew are well and their needs are being taken care of. The passenger in question was in F in Row 5. I was on the same flight and still feeling fine and now on my way up to BKK this morning on QF23. There was nothing abnormal about the flight. Typically if there is a medical issue the crew is aware of on arriving into SYD passengers would be requested to remain with their seatbelts fastened until the medical team
had boarded and assessed the passenger. From memory the inbound QF2 becomes the outbound QF11 later in the morning so I’m presuming the aircraft would have done to/from LAX and To/from LHR before being grounded.

This contradicts the NSW Heath Website information.
QF2 48D27D07-23F8-4CD6-8275-AB38A9EFF386.jpegFlight departing 27th, arriving 28th
 
The aircraft was VH-OQC - a 28 Feb departure from SIN arriving into SYD on 29 Feb.

Can't have been VH-OQC, as yesterday afternoon when QF1 was cancelled that was travelling through SIN, coming back from LHR.

If , as per Princess Fiona's post, it was a 28 February arrival into SYD, which would make it VH-OQK. After landing in SYD, it seems to have done 2 returns to DFW, so since the passenger left the seat, that would mean 5 "superficial" cleans, and up to 4 passengers in the same seat.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Yes, “returned from Singapore on 28 February” means QF2 departing SIN dated 27 February. As you will see on the afternoon that QF1 out of SYD was cancelled, VH-OQC was travelling into SIN from LHR. It would have never been scheduled to operate QF1 on 4 Mar.
 
Noticed QF has published a list of cases on their flights:

Of the 4 flights to date, 3 had arrived from SIN in the space of 4 days...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top