When your Record Locater tells you something......

[ReLoad]

Hi All,

I know this one is for us tragics that fly a lot, but of late I have had some rather cool airline record locators on bookings.

Like: 3GRLIQ
and: 2EEGGS (had that one prior to Easter i thought that was cool)
and my favourite: GHOULI

Whats your best?

 

[vbap]

Just noticed mine on upcoming trip is JJLIQI, which I think our moderators were busy consuming on their Dubai trip

(Or maybe that was FFLIQI...!)

 

[vitagen]

Mine was PALMJC which was done before Easter.

 

[ReLoad]

seems we here on AFF are well ahead of our time again:

Airline tells passenger Kathryn Stockett she's a 'goner' | News.com.au

No News at its finest.....

 

[serfty]

Had an AA booking last year - reference was LAZILY

 

[Lonely Flyer]

I have just made a premium economy award booking and my booking reference is somewhat alarming.

An anagram of YOUDIE. Apparently I cannot get it changed.

 

[GoldCanyon340]

You don't get booking references like that in First

 

[tgh]

When do you fly ?
I guess there is one positive ….they are giving you time to prepare….

 

[GoldCanyon340]

I'd avoid the food onboard.

 

[33kft]

Sounds like they need to blacklist that one.

In past lives, I've worked for a institution that used to auto-provision student usernames from their initials/part of their surname, and another that would automatically generate fingerprints that were several four letter words in a row.

Both involved some liberal blacklisting of certain terms and at times, some apology and contrition when the automated systems would make statements that don't bare repeating. Schemes like this can often surprise their creators in terms of the "creative" output generated.

 

[Pushka]

I'd avoid the food onboard.

I’d avoid their flight!

 

[Saltywings]

I must confess, I came into this thread expecting something else.

However, I am not disappointed

 

[GoldCanyon340]

Isn't this why we have Air Marshals?

 

[GoldCanyon340]

Sounds like they need to blacklist that one.

In past lives, I've worked for a institution that used to auto-provision student usernames from their initials/part of their surname, and another that would automatically generate fingerprints that were several four letter words in a row.

Both involved some liberal blacklisting of certain terms and at times, some apology and contrition when the automated systems would make statements that don't bare repeating. Schemes like this can often surprise their creators in terms of the "creative" output generated.

Even though the OP's example is an anagram, I've designed auto provision algorithms and always included the option to reference an admin table to block unwanted combinations of letters and numbers.

 

[33kft]

Even though the OP's example is an anagram, I've designed auto provision algorithms and always included the option to reference an admin table to block unwanted combinations of letters and numbers.

Sure, but have you ever met someone able to accurately predict all the combinations to put in that table? It is this process of discovery that tends to occur after the fact (of course the more predictable entries are screened out from the start, but they aren't necessarily the worst outcomes sometimes).

 

[GoldCanyon340]

Sure, but have you ever met someone able to accurately predict all the combinations to put in that table?

I do, in fact, excel in that area

 

[RooFlyer]

An anagram of youdie? Like IYEODU? Problem?

Even then, I read the word as you-dee.

 

[tdimdad]

If I was sitting next to you, you'd be rather worried when I start taking my shoes off... Sorry about that!

 

[Denali]

Me spelling it out to husband: It's Y. O. U. D. I. E

Husband thinks for a few seconds: Woody?

Me :

 

[LadyC]

Definitely sounds ominous!