Lynda2475
Suspended
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Posts
- 9,402
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Red
- Oneworld
- Emerald
I'd imagine they'd rather do noise insulation for people than potentially risk it turning into avalon 2.0.
Almost certainly going to be a dud like Avalon as too far from Sydney (postcode 2000) to be useful for tourists or anyone living in city, north shore, east, inner south or inner west (or even west to Parramatta).
The govt already spent way too much insulating homes under SYD flight path despite those people knowingly choosing to live near SYD. I do not support wasting more tax payer dollars subsidising peoples personal choice of where to live.
I still maintain removing SYD curfew would have been better than a new airport calling itself Sydney which is actually hours from the city of Sydney. SYD has advantage of ocean approach so only some traffic has to fly over homes (which are already noise insulated).
Last edited:
