DrA
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2010
- Posts
- 527
Why would there be a need for a "rescue flight"? If you ended up there because a weather event at the final destination, then why can't the same aircraft and crew be used to complete the journey once the weather event has passed? If there is a mechanical problem with the aircraft or issues with operating crew that prevents it from completing the original journey, then it would seem that the airline can no longer claim the delays are the result of a weather event outside their control.
Flight goes Guam-Chuuk-Pohnpei-Kosrae-Kwaj-Majuro-Honolulu. They refused to try again at Chuuk because of fuel and pilot flying hours. Which I totally understand, but the issue was the way United handled the stranded passengers in Pohnpei.
Can we ask the cost to get out? Was it to buy a seat or to expedite assistance from the ground staff?
And I'm still unclear why the original aircraft hasn't/can't fly out? Is the 737 still sitting on the ground there?
I'm also surprised UA hasn't arranged a rescue flight. Not astounded but mildly surprised.
I initially said that I'd pay to get a seat in J. They told me it was confirmed, then backtracked. I refused to go away because they kept changing their minds. I ended up slipping a couple of hundreds in my passport and miraculously I got a confirmed seat in Y 15 minutes later.
The original aircraft continued on to Kosrae-Kwaj-Majuru-Hololulu as it's an island hopper flight. I got on the reverse route today back to Chuuk. Everyone else is stuck in Pohnpei until Saturday at the earliest. Most are looking at mid next week to get out.