SQ321 LHR-SIN Encountered Severe Turbulence [At least 1 Fatality and 30 Injured]

The vertical acceleration during the incident (page 6)

+1.35G to -1.5G17 (i.e. a change of 2.85G) within 0.6 seconds

Then
-1.5G to +1.5G (i.e. a change of 3G) within the next 4 seconds

The aircraft was thought to be caught in an convective updraft with vertical speeds of 8000-9000 feet/min despite a nose down attitude of -5deg (page 24)

Pilots did not see any clouds and there were no weather returns on the weather radar.

FDR events on page 25

The one fatality was reported by the coroner to be acute heart failure.

There was some discussion about whether the weather radar was fully operational.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

It sounds to me like the weather radar was not picking up weather at all (perhaps due to some kind of fault?) in the configuration that it was in prior to descending to below 31,000 feet.
But then didn't it say there was no fault with the system when tested on the later repatriation flight to Singapore?

The whole report is very difficult reading. Makes me wonder if it’s trying to hide something?
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top