Quickstatus
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2013
- Posts
- 18,451
Not necessarily.the actions taken are not inline with what the hotel brand is supposed to represent - certainly not for 6k USD a night.
I dont think we even know what the resort brand is supposed to represent.
It really depends on who the hotel believes the target market is... Is the target market significantly different from the market the YouTuber represents?
In my view, a really upmarket hotel may actually want to make their vibe über-exclusive and extremely discreet and ban all these Influencers and YTuber vloggers carrying video equipment through the place.
Will this affect the resort? I doubt it.
Think of an exclusive club. The bouncer determine who is eligible to enter and who is not. They bounce the undesirables. The undesirables then complain on their social media. Does the exclusive club care?. I dont think so as it would only make the club more exclusive and attractive to the right people.
Did this YouTuber inadvertently increase the attractiveness of this resort to a certain type of clientele? . Possibly
But in the end who knows.. maybe more info will come out in the following days.
Why?,Aman's silence is damning though
I actually think silence is the best policy.
I don't see any reason why a USD$6-9K/night resort would publicly respond to a YouTuber.
The reservation was not confirmed by email. A refund on the way. There remains zero residual obligation.
But lets see what happens.
Last edited:

