Qantas unveils the biggest changes to status in program history

^^^ Different strokes for different folks; the question is, what does QF's "preferred" loyal customer look like (presumably those who spend the most) and what do these changes mean for them as a group (if that group can even be generalised)?
I don't think it's a question of the preferred customer.
I think QF had a number in mind for the LTP tier and based the threshold on that.
However I suspect the data inputted into the modelling would have included the unusually high number of elite status holders post-COVID.
Status keeper and other promotions meant there was no attrition for about 3 years.
It probably also over-estimated the burden of LTP members by over-estimating their future travel frequency, based on pre-COVID work travel.
 
I don't think it's a question of the preferred customer.
I think QF had a number in mind for the LTP tier and based the threshold on that.
However I suspect the data inputted into the modelling would have included the unusually high number of elite status holders post-COVID.
Status keeper and other promotions meant there was no attrition for about 3 years.
It probably also over-estimated the burden of LTP members by over-estimating their future travel frequency, based on pre-COVID work travel.
With no attrition
There probably wasn’t a lot of travel either … so usage was on LOW DEMAND
 
With no attrition
There probably wasn’t a lot of travel either … so usage was on LOW DEMAND
Different types of data.
Membership is just a number, at a particular point in time.
Usage would need to be measured over a period of time.
So COVID would have impacted each differently.
 

Much lower threshold for some! (paywalled and maybe the article is different to headline)
The government has passed a lot of legislation recently to regulate campaign donations.
An important reform to avoid AU becoming like the US, where the government can be bought - and has been.
Musk has boasted of how he bought Trump a second term, and AIPAC is busy buying members of congress on behalf of a foreign state.
However the danger to democracy in AU comes from lobbyists and soft influence like this.
It's not unique to Labor - they just happen to be in Government right now.
 
Not much more in the article, though I did roll my eyes at the AFR using the term "points-maxxers" to describe AFFers.
She’s been in the Fed Larkiament since 2001 so blame the Ballarat voters for her longevity and this inevitable SC earn for LTP
JUST LIKE Albo and Penny

Or is this complimentary membership ?
 
She’s been in the Fed Larkiament since 2001 so blame the Ballarat voters for her longevity and this inevitable SC earn for LTP
JUST LIKE Albo and Penny

Or is this complimentary membership ?
I would be surprised if it’s due to flying. As a lowly opposition member for 15 / 25 years.

Wong and Albanese had decent stints in roles which required international travel.

It would be pretty hard to make LTP solely on domestic travel
 
Hang about - no status earn on Commonwealth business, I thought?
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I don't think it's a question of the preferred customer.
I think QF had a number in mind for the LTP tier and based the threshold on that.
However I suspect the data inputted into the modelling would have included the unusually high number of elite status holders post-COVID.
Status keeper and other promotions meant there was no attrition for about 3 years.
It probably also over-estimated the burden of LTP members by over-estimating their future travel frequency, based on pre-COVID work travel.
No the data for introducing LTP was nothing to do with modeling based on inflated numbers post Covid
LTP was announced prior to this in June 2019 and commenced in September 2019.
 
No the data for introducing LTP was nothing to do with modeling based on inflated numbers post Covid
LTP was announced prior to this in June 2019 and commenced in September 2019.
Thanks for clarifying.
it's just naked unfairness without any evidence base then.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top