The irony is they pinched those aircraft off JQ and no one would have batted an eyelid about the coughty config (pun intended). What was JQ thinking?…I can't see that we've heard from the CEO since the commercial launch. So here's one report (probably paywalled, sorry)
Hmmmm ...
But lets be fair and hear how they listen.
They’re actually proper loos compared to what IB have shoehorned into the rear galley (all three loos).""
What would Alan want?
Ah. $$$
They’re a bit pokey but do the trick. And don’t take away seats or $$$…
The difference is JQ doesn't reserve toilets for special pax in its narrowbodies as it's (until the XLRs) all Y seating (they do in the 788)Did they do a survey and find that JP pax's bladders were more robust than Qantas pax?
The Facebook post by The Guardian had an interesting set of headline pictures:
But all in all, no one really wants to be winning this kind of p***ing contest.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
But as I mentioned above, they did actually put in proper loos that could otherwise be used for seats (AFAIK).So maybe it was just spite?or just habit, to do the minimum? Sorry, I know I'm being unkind, but honestly .... why? Did they do a survey and find that JP pax's bladders were more robust than Qantas pax?
OK, I've been edumacated!But as I mentioned above, they did actually put in proper loos that could otherwise be used for seats (AFAIK).
Happy to be told otherwise, but those loos on the QF A321XLR are probably not wildly different to what you might see on many J cabin wide bodies.OK, I've been edumacated!In my defence, I have yet to experience any economy loo on international flights#; having a strong bladder, on domestics not for as long as I can recall, and only the only time I flew JQ it was also international (Bali) in J.
I tell a lie. Enter Air, CPH-SFJ it was all economy and being in 2C, I used the loo up the front.