I don't think that "shall" is correct grammar in that context."you should be eligible for lounge access".
What tripe. You "shall" be eligible is definitive, "should" is an empty statement.
Out of curiosity, is there anything in the QF app about relaxing in the lounge? eg here’s an example from one of my future trips.I'm WP flying SYD-AKL-PPT on a QF ticket in Y.
Was it determined whether I'll have lounge access in AKL?

So I was initially denied entry by lounge staff who advised me that the rules had recently been changed and that travelling on a TN operated flight does not grant access even if booked on a QF flight number. I asked when the rules had been changed she said earlier this year.I wrote to QF about access when travelling SYD-AKL-PPT on QF marketed flight as QF WP and received the following response:
As a Qantas Platinum Frequent Flyer, you are entitled to access eligible Qantas International Business Lounges when travelling on a Qantas (QF) flight number. Qantas advises that Platinum members may access Qantas International Lounges when their ticket contains a Qantas flight number, regardless of whether the flight is operated by a partner airline.
Based on the information provided, your Auckland–Papeete sector is booked with a Qantas flight number (QF) and operated by Air Tahiti Nui. Therefore, provided your boarding pass reflects the Qantas flight number, you should be eligible for lounge access in Auckland under your Platinum Frequent Flyer benefits.
We recommend presenting your boarding pass and Qantas Frequent Flyer membership details upon arrival at the lounge. We wish you an enjoyable trip and thank you for your continued loyalty as a Platinum Frequent Flyer.
Bloody hopeless. Glad you got inSo I was initially denied entry by lounge staff who advised me that the rules had recently been changed and that travelling on a TN operated flight does not grant access even if booked on a QF flight number. I asked when the rules had been changed she said earlier this year.
I then pulled out the above email from QF and she quickly glanced at it but insisted I still did not have access. Upon standing my ground she offered for the manager to come out and discuss it with me which I accepted. They read the email together and made quips of the words 'may' and 'should', basically implying that they had discretion whether to grant me entry or not based on the email from Qantas.
I was reluctantly granted entry after being asked to forward them the email from QF.
So I was initially denied entry by lounge staff who advised me that the rules had recently been changed and that travelling on a TN operated flight does not grant access even if booked on a QF flight number. I asked when the rules had been changed she said earlier this year.
I then pulled out the above email from QF and she quickly glanced at it but insisted I still did not have access. Upon standing my ground she offered for the manager to come out and discuss it with me which I accepted. They read the email together and made quips of the words 'may' and 'should', basically implying that they had discretion whether to grant me entry or not based on the email from Qantas.
I was reluctantly granted entry after being asked to forward them the email from QF.
This is why I feel it is my absolute duty to always do a FULL and thorough lounge trek through HKG and never fail to stop by our good friends at QR when in Singapore... (let QF get billed for as much as possible...)Just QF continuing their total contempt for their so called 'valued frequent flyers - with status". The cost to the lounge versus the loss of any goodwill (if QF has any) says it all.
This is why I feel it is my absolute duty to always do a FULL and thorough lounge trek through HKG and never fail to stop by our good friends at QR when in Singapore... (let QF get billed for as much as possible...)
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
