FlyingKangaroo
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2020
- Posts
- 953
- Qantas
- Gold
- Virgin
- Gold
- Star Alliance
- Gold
The US DOT/courts have also ruled that pet dander is so prevalent in public spaces that airline cabins are no more or less at risk.
So the allergy angle has been ruled out in the USA… and given that’s one of the most litigious countries in the world… if they can’t prevent the carriage of let’s on that ground, it would be hard pressed to get the argument up anywhere else.
In the same vein, it's not illegal to travel with or eat foods that can pose real danger to other passengers who may be allergic to them. Some airlines may choose not to serve them and some are willing to make announcements asking passengers not to eat them, but again, society requires cooperation and balance.
Still, I acknowledge that there could be situations where a severely allergic passenger has real concerns sitting so close to a cat or dog, or where someone might simply be afraid of them. Again, though: balance, and these situations are likely to be infrequent enough that they can be reasonably managed in the moment.
This change of policy isn't suddenly turning Virgin into a flying Petbarn.
