Oz to MNL sleepy no more

Status
Not open for further replies.

Melburnian1

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Posts
25,485
While mainland Chinese airlines have expanded hugely into Australia, opening new routes aplenty and increasing flight frequencies in other cases, some routes have remained stagnant for a while.

MEL to MNL is one, with PR having been the only nonstop carrier and the frequency having been at just three flights a week each way for a few years. It has upgraded aircraft to refitted A333s with very good lie flat seats in J, four across, a new W class and eight - not previous nine - across in Y, with IFE standard.

However from next week frequency on this route will rise to 5x week although the two new flights will arrive and depart MEL in the small hours, designed to maximise northbound connections to LHR where PR has daily B773ER flights and tends to offer cheap fares for a legacy airline.

In August 5J will shake up this market with 3x week A333s, although the seating is all Y and very confined. Not recommended for 190cm tall ladies or gents.

Further north, QF is moving to SYD - MNL dailies before the end of 2018. At present it's 6x week but not so long ago was only 5x. Many businessmen and women travel there as it's not just an expanding economy but home, as we all know, to many call centres and other business outsourcing (whatever the latter means.)

PR will also at some stage replace its grotty and non-IFE A343s on the BNE - MNL route with new A321neos but I gather CASA still may have to give these regulatory approval. We may see these also flying to MEL and SYD with latter maybe to become 2x daily: at present this route for PR is a split schedule with the traditional overnight flight south and mid morning flight back four days a week, but an 1100 ex MNL and an 0600 earlybird out of SYD 3x week. These are also the redone A333s at present.

QF enjoys very good load factors on the SYD - MNL route but as with some other SEAsian routes I can't see it offering a MEL - MNL nonstop. A few years ago, one SYD - MNL flight deviated via BNE (different day each direction) but that ceased and never resumed.

While the Filipino migrant community at 300000 doesn't match the Indian one, both are fast growing so that must explain some of the rise in flight frequencies. Interesting that Manila is much better served nonstop from Oz than is New Delhi or elsewhere in India, as only AI operate nonstops to New Delhi. Sri Lankan Airlines (UL) has a daily MEL - CMB that's doing well and must carry some connectors to India, but SQ historically grabbed much of this traffic.

PR is indicating on some map that it wants to resume flying to PER. When not so long ago it ran MNL - DRW - PER, that was dropped after just three months. It also wants to fly to India.

High season to visit the beaches up there is roughly Jan to early May with probably best weather in late Jan- all of Feb, and March and April hotter. Don't visit in months like August: too humid for my liking.

So, sleepy no more.
 
Last edited:
My 13 trips to MNL last year had me transiting from BNE to MNL/CRK through a variety of SYD, SIN & HKG.

The trips I did on QF MNL-SYD-MNL were always full or very close to it.

I am welcoming the new direct BNE-MNL service.

The Philippines is booming with foreign investment from Korea, Japan & China. Seems to be driving the construction activity.

The "business processing" industry that I am in is also going fast BUT wages growth is >12% per annum. Ouch.

Happy days.

Alby
 
I would rather transit via woop woop than take a direct flight of this duration on a 737/A320.
 
I would rather transit via woop woop than take a direct flight of this duration on a 737/A320.

John K, the posts above did not discuss B737s/B738s or A320s.

Once again, you have mystified me. The A321neo is in the same family as A320s but differs somewhat.
 
John K, the posts above did not discuss B737s/B738s or A320s.

Once again, you have mystified me. The A321neo is in the same family as A320s but differs somewhat.
Still a single aisle aircraft? You wouldn't want to be on some of the 220+ seat aircraft.
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

John K, the posts above did not discuss B737s/B738s or A320s.

Once again, you have mystified me. The A321neo is in the same family as A320s but differs somewhat.

Still a single aisle aircraft? You wouldn't want to be on some of the 220+ seat aircraft.

I don't see what is so mystifying about JohnK's response? No matter how you spin it, it is still a single aisle aircraft.
 
Interestingly MNL-LHR is slightly shorter in distance than SIN-LHR - I only just realised this after being piqued by the idea that MNL is a kind of a hub

Though MNL is east of SIN it importantly sits further north than equatorial SIN.
 
Surely MNL is only a hub in its own mind.

What do we need for a hub airport? connection times, transit experience, terminal facilities, terminal (airline) inter-connection. All of these things do exist at MNL in a Filipino version but they do not compare to a Changi experience.

In the context of Melburnian1 discussion I didn't consider the aspect of aircraft size. For BNE the new option for a 7 hour single leg hop to MNL trumps a 3 leg QF 12.5 hour journey via SYD. There is a health benefit to a shorter transit.

I have one more BNE-(SYD)-MNL return QF trip then I'll be happy to use the PR service. (Never thought I would say that.)

Alby
 
albatross710, completely agree that SIN is unrivalled worldwide as a hub. I gather the transfer to T4 isn't very good but everything else is.

Others may have more foresight but I can't see the Singapore experience being as well replicated anywhere else that's a logical transfer point for Australians. HKG, KUL, BWN and especially DXB and AUH come nowhere near what SIN has achieved. (Have not been to DOH or CAN.)

However Quickstatus has a valid point too. Many travel on price. PR can have cheap fares from Oz to LHR, and offers connections in MNL to a non stop to YYZ, which is not an airport served nonstop from anywhere in Oz yet Toronto's a major Canadian city. This airline will soon operate nonstop MNL - JFK so its blurbs inform me.

Plus with 5J starting soon from MEL to augment its SYD flights, more will use MNL to transfer to northeast Asia or elsewhere. 5J hasn't had all sweetness on its international routes as it terminated some, but it has a large number of flights to northeast Asia.

MNL has made some improvements such as an inter-terminal shuttle bus that uses the internal airport roads. This runs every half an hour or 20 mins - can't remember which. A lot better than inching along some of the public roads at busier times.

Just don't be there on 31 August when airlines are switching terminals!
 
....For BNE the new option for a 7 hour single leg hop to MNL trumps a 3 leg QF 12.5 hour journey via SYD. There is a health benefit to a shorter transit. I have one more BNE-(SYD)-MNL return QF trip then I'll be happy to use the PR service. (Never thought I would say that.) Alby

Alby, forgive me for being so thick but wouldn't BNE - MNL on QF just be two flights i.e. BNE down to SYD, and then QF19?

Why is it '3 legs?'

Agree that the nonstop PR will be a lot less tiring for you. The new aircraft (assuming it's approved by CASA on time for the proposed commencement on 2 July 2018) should be good.
 
Alby, forgive me for being so thick but wouldn't BNE - MNL on QF just be two flights i.e. BNE down to SYD, and then QF19?

Why is it '3 legs?'
Thanks for noticing Melburnian1 I was feeling a little devious when I wrote that. I was including the Syd Dom-Intl bus transfer. It's another waiting lounge, another boarding pass scan, another vehicle boarding. :)
 
Thanks for noticing Melburnian1 I was feeling a little devious when I wrote that. I was including the Syd Dom-Intl bus transfer. It's another waiting lounge, another boarding pass scan, another vehicle boarding. :)

I vaguely recall being "delayed" one day when I missed that transfer bus and had to wait around 20 minutes for the next one.

So next time that happens to you, write it up under "QF delays/cancellations."
 
In the context of Melburnian1 discussion I didn't consider the aspect of aircraft size. For BNE the new option for a 7 hour single leg hop to MNL trumps a 3 leg QF 12.5 hour journey via SYD. There is a health benefit to a shorter transit.
I don't understand why QF dislikes tag flights. Did SYD-BNE-MNL not work?
 
I don't understand why QF dislikes tag flights. Did SYD-BNE-MNL not work?

JohnK, the one time I used it, memory suggests that about 50 per cent of passengers boarded in BNE. In my book, that's a success.

Maybe because QF doesn't like the cost and complexity it adds, it was dropped. The airline may have made a judgement it could satisfactorily fill its flights ex and to SYD nonstop (and at a sufficient yield.)

It was always up to MNL via BNE on a different day of the week than the returning flight called in.

For travellers, once a week arrangements are hardly ideal on any mode, although granted, it's not as if there's no domestic flights BNE - SYD v.v.
 
I too previously used it. The alternating day and direction was manageable, just had to arrange work around the days to perfect the travel to get direct flight each way.

The PR direct BNE-MNL flight will be putting pressure on the QF19/QF20 service. I already notice that the QF price is now often the same as the PR direct service ie QF has to operate longer service at the same price.

Tag flights are an interesting concept and appears to work well for PR & SQ to develop new markets. To my mind the tagging works away from the carriers' home base whereas the economics could well be different for QF within its home base where it has competing domestic services.

Alby
 
JohnK, the one time I used it, memory suggests that about 50 per cent of passengers boarded in BNE. In my book, that's a success.
I agree. I don't understand the dislike for tag flights.

Even something such as BNE-CNS-HKG would work. Another one would be ADL-PER-HKG.
 
According to Routes Online, MNL - MEL will soon be daily:

Philippine Airlines at the launch of winter 2018/19 season plans to increase Manila – Melbourne route, currently served 5 times a week. From 28OCT18, overall service will increase to 7 weekly, operated by Airbus A330-300 aircraft.

PR207 MNL1645 – 0405+1MEL 330 x246
PR209 MNL2110 – 0830+1MEL 330 246

PR208 MEL0550 – 1105MNL 330 x357
PR210 MEL1015 – 1530MNL 330 35

----------------

The A350 starts MNL - LHR and MNL - JFK, both nonstop, in late October. PR208 connects to LHR, and PR209 from LHR. These are both efficient connections, with the LHR flights almost always on time or early (unlike QF1/QF2, although QF9/10 via PER are better.)

PR210 from MEL will connect to the 2100 hours PR126 nonstop to JFK, while on the return either flight will connect from PR127 ex JFK, but it's a long layover as the flight from New York arrives in MNL at 0716 hours.

It is also reducing capacity to and from SYD as the A321neo takes over, initially twice weekly, the five times a week, but around Christmas/January it reverts to the larger A333 (also from Routes online);

Philippine Airlines in last week’s schedule update revised planned Airbus A321neo service on Manila – Sydney route. Planned A321neo service entry on 10JUL18 on this market remains unchanged, however this is adjusted to one-time service.

Planned regular service is now scheduled from 24JUL18, as A321neo operates on 2 of 7 weekly (Day 24 from MNL, Day 35 from SYD), increasing to 5 from 30JUL18.

PR213 MNL1115 – 2100SYD 321 137
PR211 MNL2225 – 0845+1SYD 321 24
PR211 MNL2225 – 0845+1SYD 330 56

PR214 SYD0600 – 1155MNL 321 124
PR212 SYD1030 – 1650MNL 321 35
PR212 SYD1030 – 1650MNL 330 67

From 01DEC18 to 31JAN19, the A330 will once again operate this route on daily basis.
 
Philippine Airlines in last week’s schedule update revised planned Airbus A321neo service on Manila – Sydney route. Planned A321neo service entry on 10JUL18 on this market remains unchanged, however this is adjusted to one-time service.

Thanks for the update. Any intel regarding the BNE-MNL route?
 
Thanks for the update. Any intel regarding the BNE-MNL route?

This airline is yet to publish northern winter from end October timetable. I doubt whether it would have the modern planes to increase BNE, so likely to stay at four per week each way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top