How to resolve two issues with one simple action

[Hvr]

Here on AFF there are two major issues in the Qantas thread:

1) http://www.australianfrequentflyer....ntas-lounge-shoe-policy-concerning-73536.html and:

2) http://www.australianfrequentflyer....priority-boarding-qf-domestic-what-30246.html

Now if there was a role rotation whereby the people in charge of shoe/thong inspection were put in charge of domestic priority boarding and vice versa then there is a good possibility that the level of enforcement appropriate to each situation would be applied according to the AFF threads. :mrgreen:

So my fellow AFFers, would this work?

Should we at least ask Qantas to trial the job swap?

 

[get me outta here]

Innovative thinking Hvr. That be considered a promotion / demotion.

 

[marki]

Humiliation

 

[medhead]

The consistent issue is customer convenience and service. Both cases involve Qantas denying passengers - either lounge access or advertised benefits. I'm not sure a job swap would be enough to overcome the inherent need to deny the passenger.

Red Roo - this post is made in a jocular and jovial manner.