General Medical issues thread

[Lost Redditor]

Strangulated hernia: an incarcerated hernia that becomes a medical emergency because the blood supply to the herniated tissue is being cut off.

I might change my phone consult with my GP for tomorrow to an in-person visit then.

 

[Quickstatus]

I might change my phone consult with my GP for tomorrow to an in-person visit then.

If it can be pushed back in, by definition it is a reducible hernia not strangulated.

 

[prozac]

Monday morning is my annual cardiologist visit. I am hoping I can get a change of medication as Amlodipine, the calcium channel blocker I take, makes my ankles swell excessively. Sometime I will have a few days / week where walking is difficult when soft tissue is pinching and it feels like a soft tissue injury. I need the Amlodipine to keep cardiac spasm angina in check. I no-longer get woken through the night with crushing chest pain but I still get it when wake at 0500-0600 for a bathroom break. By the time I return to bed the spasm has started and I need the angina spray to settle the spasm. My reaction to the pain sometimes wakes MrsP. Hoping a change of medication is the answer as, for reasons noted above, I don't want to increase the dose. I suspect Dr will suggest an angiogram just to make sure I don't have more blockage. This time last year was 95+% and I was told I certainly know when to return to base.

 

[drron]

Amlodipine isn’’ The only Ca channel blocker but usually the worst for ankle swelling. Maybe just a change of blocker.

 

[prozac]

Amlodipine isn’’ The only Ca channel blocker but usually the worst for ankle swelling. Maybe just a change of blocker.

Yes, that was thinking. I contemplated reducing to half a tablet (cardiologist did say I could play around with dose) but when I was on half I was getting the 2/3/4am angina attacks. Have to say I was feeling a bit gun shy, but perhaps my reaction might be different if I halved the dose now. The ultimate aim is to eliminate the morning angina as well.

 

[drron]

I was around for quite a while before Ca channel blockers were around such as diltiazem and amlodipine. So I used verapamil. Now when the new ones came out Verapamil was forgotten but I kept using it because it worked. And I got proof when the Monica study-

https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/heart-stroke-vascular-diseases/who-monica-study-australia-1984-1993/summary

The study was initially to ascertain the difference in survival between a teaching hospital coronary care unit and a regional hospitals coronary care unit. Newcastle was one of 2 Australian study centres with Newcastle's John Hunter hospital and Maitland hospital. I was the director of the Maitland Hospitals coronary care unit. It was the only centre where the regional hospital had a statistically significant better survival rate than the teaching hospital after a heart attack plus a statistically significant reduction in heart failure despite having no age restriction on admission to the coronary unit.

I had 2 significant differences in treatment. first at the time of study I continued use of heparin when the official line wasn't needed. Secondly I had a higher use of Ca blocking agents and for me it was verapamil. At tte time it was used in Scandinavia for heart faiulre with good results. Subsequently it was shown to be effective in what was then called diastolic heart failure subsequently called HFPEF.
My colleagues in Newcastle refused to acknowledge me because I used too much verapamil.