A question to our Legal Eagles. If it is found to be fraudulent could there be any ramifications given this was tendered as evidence in an Australian court ?There are three main possibilities
1) Fraudulent test result of 16/12 created on 26/12
2) Real test result of 16/12 created on 26/12
3) Test result of 26/12 with a date error
and the real stretch:
4) a real test of 16/12 using a super high test number created on 16/12
Not a legal eagle, but I would expect not, unless there is evidence of Djokovic personally contributed to the alleged State-based/testing facility-based/public health authority-based fraud.
AO now increased to 80% capacity for Saturday and Sunday .....Minister then scurries away from Twitter
Presumably he swore the test result into evidence in his affidavit. If it is shown to be false and evidence can be produced to show he knew it to be false then he has perjured himself.
This is an example of a Sponsored Post, one of the many ways you can advertise on the Australian Frequent Flyer.
Other options include banner advertisements on our content and forum pages or our newsletter. You can also purchase an audio message on our podcast - or if you just want to try it out, you can sponsor a thread.
If you'd prefer not to see any advertisements (including these sponsored posts), you can become an AFF Supporter from just $6 and instantly remove all advertisements from our website!