codash1099
Established Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
- Posts
- 2,879
- Qantas
- Platinum
This guy usually sounds sensible. but this seems a bit far fetched.
April Fools?This guy usually sounds sensible. but this seems a bit far fetched.
for their US Government Defense contracts? The profitable part of the business.More to the point, why would anyone want to buy them?
Unfortunately it's not that profitable at the moment. They've taken a $6billion hit on the tanker contractfor their US Government Defense contracts? The profitable part of the business.
Yeah, that one can only be described as an own-goal. They started with a very well known, capable and reliable platform, and still blew out the schedule and costs.Unfortunately it's not that profitable at the moment. They've taken a $6billion hit on the tanker contract
![]()
Boeing to take charges on KC-46 tanker over quality issue -finance chief
Boeing Co. will take additional charges to the KC-46 tanker program due to a supplier quality issue with the center fuel tank, the company's finance chief said Wednesday.www.reuters.com
Yet another own goal, really. The 767 was an excellent aircraft, though I suspect that the aircraft that actually won the tanker competition would have been better choice. You know, the one that just about everyone else, Australia included, uses, and which came into service without any of the Boeing luggage.Yeah, that one can only be described as an own-goal. They started with a very well known, capable and reliable platform, and still blew out the schedule and costs.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements