Connection from QF to AA not on same PNR. Will AA look after me if QF is delayed?

Status
Not open for further replies.

vandy

Member
Joined
May 10, 2008
Posts
102
Flying into SFO then needing to transfer to a domestic flight. I want to fly AA (mainly for points, SCs) but they don't have many options out of SFO and it would be a tight connection, only just within the minimum connection time.

I booked the QF return months ago, so this will be a new booking on a different PNR direct with AA.

QF recently dropped the oneworld benefits for interlining bags, but is there still any benefit that I would get by flying AA as a OW partner, so that if my QF flight is delayed into SFO, they'd accomodate me for free?

Or am I better off flying another airline that gives me a better connection time?

Apart from points and SCs, is there any benefit for choosing OW if another non-OW airline has a better time and better price?
 
If it's not on the same PNR then you're not protected. Also a tight connection on arriving into the US is not advisable in case it take you a long time to get through the border checks.
 
Flying into SFO then needing to transfer to a domestic flight. I want to fly AA (mainly for points, SCs) but they don't have many options out of SFO and it would be a tight connection ...

?

Would you have a final destination in mind? Are you able fly via the DFW hub if flying AA (and there are also other hub options) or are you going in another direction?

My upcoming SYD-SFO flight arrives at 9.30am and I am due out about 4 hours later to DFW, and then a further onward connection.

Edit: With 'MCT', just make sure that the connection is something that you will be comfortable with, on International to Domestic
 
Last edited:
I booked the QF return months ago, so this will be a new booking on a different PNR direct with AA.

If you really want to fly with AA, a travel agent is probably your safest option. They should be able to link the existing international PNR to a new AA one.

When I've had QF and AA on the same PNR and QF was late, they've handed out special passes to expedite immigration, which is helpful.

QF recently dropped the oneworld benefits for interlining bags, but is there still any benefit that I would get by flying AA as a OW partner, so that if my QF flight is delayed into SFO, they'd accomodate me for free?

I haven't noticed a difference in recent years between when AA is responsible or not.

Even if AA is responsible, "free" may not be the option offered these days. On my last AA trip, they decided I would not make a connection in DFW due to late arrival from LAX and gave my seat to someone else. I found out in the queue to board (I had made it to the gate early in fact) that they had moved me to a flight the next morning. The accommodation offered was a voucher that didn't cover the full cost of the room, and the hotel was a US$50 taxi ride away, which they don't cover. In retrospect, I wondered if that was legal, but at the time you just stand in a queue with dozens of other impacted passengers receiving your paltry vouchers.

For flights that run regularly, like ORD-LAX, they have just made me waitlist, and the priority order depends on your OW status. I missed a QF connection at LAX due to one these. I was top of the priority list at ORD, but missed out five times. The sixth time (six hours later than my booked flight) they put me in F, but it was too late to make the QF flight. QF moved me to the next day without a change fee very generously, even though it wasn't their responsibility.

When AA hasn't been responsible (I've shown up late, had QF on a separate PNR, etc.), there hasn't been any measurable difference in service. They've just waitlisted me as per above.

vandy1648405; said:
Apart from points and SCs, is there any benefit for choosing OW if another non-OW airline has a better time and better price?

If you have OW status, keep in mind the benefits depending on your tier, like free baggage allowances, free selection of better seats, preferred boarding, etc. Travelling in the US can be pretty painful without these.

Also, if you get stuck in the waitlisting circus above, higher status helps.

This may all sound a bit negative, but my US flights always involve at least two connections, and I have a historical 50% success rate, despite leaving three plus hours between flights. Others may have had more positive experiences

If I wasn't OW Emerald, I doubt I would choose AA if there more convenient, cheaper alternatives.
 
If you really want to fly with AA, a travel agent is probably your safest option. They should be able to link the existing international PNR to a new AA one.
...
This!

A ticket can be issued as a "conjunction ticket" with another existing ticket.

A good TA can do this ... as well as possibly save on some of the +++ on the AA booking (as this case may be).
 
A ticket can be issued as a "conjunction ticket" with another existing ticket.

A good TA can do this ... as well as possibly save on some of the +++ on the AA booking (as this case may be).
I saw you had a similar comment on another thread (with an award booking) but how is this done and what are the benefits (beyond the obvious of linked PNR)?
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Basically because the internal USA AA domestic flights are booked in conjunction with existing international travel to/from the USA, certain components of the normal +++ may not be payable.

It's not so much a linked PNR, it is a ticket issued in conjunction with another.

The TA I have used charges a fee for their services - but only if the nett results in a saving (i.e. TA fee < saving in +++).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top