Qantas grounds spoof Twitter account
I really don't think social media is Qantas's strong point.
Queue post with the perspective of AFF's Social Media expert in residence.
Short version: Oh cry me a freaking river. This isn't even worthy of a single paragraph being written about it. Non story being written by those who don't understand the medium and issues.
Long version: Once again, supposed journalists looking for a cheap non-story that'll get heaps of impressions online that creates a mountain out of a molehill.
1) The parody account in question was in clear violation of the Twitter terms of service, in that parody accounts must explicitly and clearly state they are parody accounts. @QantasPR failed to do so.
2) The confusion arose because the account was using the registered trade marks of a company without it's permission, for an unauthorised purpose, in a manner which would violate relevant trademark law.
2a) The parody defense doesn't apply to the use of QF trademarks by the parody account as the logo was presented unaltered from the registered trade mark.
3) Qantas's complaint was specially in relation to (2), and not that the account existed.
4) Twitter, Inc. made the decision to close the account based on the TOS violation outlined at (1). The fact that the closure of the account occured after QF's complaint specifically in relation to trademark misuse on Twitter's platform is just a case of the Latin fallacy post hoc ergo propter hoc.
The idiot behind the parody account should know better, and there is a significant body of material out there documenting best practice in the operation of parody twitter accounts.
Further, since the account came into existence, several social media professionals have attempted to communicate with the account to inform it that they may be operating outside the Twitter TOS. They had their chance to fix it, they failed, and consequently got exactly what was coming to them for breaking the rules.
And before any zealots throw around the BS that I only ever give QF a spirited defense - pretty much all of the commentary related to alleged social media wrongdoing around these parts is majority QF related. If a story related to DJ or another carrier ever surfaces, you better dammed well expect that I'm going to defend to the hilt whomever/whichever party is in the right.