Melburnian1
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Posts
- 25,483
I've always questioned how they only really review 5 star hotels and business class flights. Granted that may be where the clicks are, but not all of us road warriors are blessed with corporate travel policies that generous, or sufficient seniority.
Travel policies only allowing travel in Y (Y+ if over 12 hours) with coughty cheap hotels aren't unheard of, and no one reviews them from the perspective of a business traveller, besides the odd youtuber in some rare cases.
Just my 2c.
Agree. This was raised by many with David Flynn and his staff but 'Australian Business Traveller' (not to be confused with the much better print plus online 'Business Traveller Asia Pacific') declined to change its policy.
The huge number of ads for super fast cars and expensive watches on what was 'AusBT' was also raised by quite a sizeable number of online contributors before the rebranding but similarly ignored.
This change to 'Executive Traveller' by the former 'AusBT' looks a fail. I can't be bothered visiting this site any more as it's long lost its focus.
Many entities (such as the former Fairfax, now Nine Group newspapers) change their websites for little or no reason. We all must adapt to changing times, but "change for change's sake" is not a good policy.
If money has changed hands in this rebranding of "AusBT", whoever has purchased it may find it's not worth it.
Last edited: