Airline Ratings: World’s Best Airlines 2026

Every ranking will have faults, some screamingly obvious ones, but I don't mind them, esp when the methodology is clearly explained (no so much here, though). And I bet GT has a laugh when reading comments from people who hate the whole thing and say it isn't worth presenting.

The list itself of the top airlines is generally fine. - it’s always going to be somewhat subjective and a case of YMMV., especially within the top 10.

I do have a problem with the methodology they use for separating out Hybrid carriers . Not sure how Air NZ, JetBlue , Air France and KLM (“full service”) differ in that regard from hybrid carries such as BA, Lufthansa, American etc. All have a mix of LCC and full service.

A quick glance, for example, of the NZ website when booking TT or domestic, makes it pretty clear they have a hybrid offering on short - medium haul flights.
 
If you’ve scored an Aria seat, it is better than QSuite IMHO.

CX F&B has recovered considerably since the post COVID lows plus I’m seeing more reports suggesting that QR continues to slide (or at least isn’t as consistent as it used to be).

I am flying economy, but a few recent youtube reports seems that the service is decent, I have scored an exit row on the overnight flight up to Hong Kong.
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

The list itself of the top airlines is generally fine. - it’s always going to be somewhat subjective and a case of YMMV., especially within the top 10.

I do have a problem with the methodology they use for separating out Hybrid carriers . Not sure how Air NZ, JetBlue , Air France and KLM (“full service”) differ in that regard from hybrid carries such as BA, Lufthansa, American etc. All have a mix of LCC and full service.

A quick glance, for example, of the NZ website when booking TT or domestic, makes it pretty clear they have a hybrid offering on short - medium haul flights.
NZ differs because… the CEO of AR says so!

CEO Sharon Petersen said, “I’ve been flying Air New Zealand economy since 2014, and it just never disappoints. Now I have a young family, little things like extra amenities, helpful crew, in-flight entertainment, and meal options really matter, and Air New Zealand gets it right every single time.”
 
Air NZ cant be full service as they dont have J on domestic flights, its an all whY fleet. I found this out recently as have to go to DUD in December and neither NZ or JQ offered J from Auckland or Christchurch, only LCC whY i.e no meal.

Yet can at least get euro J on LHR-EDI with a full hot breaky on BA.

So clear these guys have no idea what full service is. I meqn it is apthetic for a national carrier to only offer LCC experience on domestic flights.
 
Last edited:
have a problem with the methodology they use for separating out Hybrid carriers .
Like everything a bit subjective.

Personally think they'd be better separating out International long haul Economy (and even Business) vs short haul/ domestic (where applicable).

Eg. Air NZ long haul product is quite good, but domestic/TT is far more LCC-esque.

Even Qantas is essentially moving to only offering seatback IFE on its widebodies.

And obviously then doesn't bring down all the Euro airlines due to Euro business.
 
In this day of almost everyone having a smart phone, tablet or laptop when travelling id rank seat back entertainment as significantly lower consideration compared with having more than one class, extra leg room options, hot meal, seat comfort, lounge, power in seat etc.

So easy to bring own entrtainment (just download content before), i only ever look at map on IFE.
 
In this day of almost everyone having a smart phone, tablet or laptop when travelling id rank seat back entertainment as significantly lower consideration compared with having more than one class, extra leg room options, hot meal, seat comfort, lounge, power in seat etc.

So easy to bring own entrtainment (just download content before), i only ever look at map on IFE.

On short haul, agree. However, on long haul the ergonomics of BYOD are not great on a 13 hr flight, watching something on a small phone screen, even moreso if there's no holder.
 
I watch entertainmemt on tablet, save phone battery for arrival.on older plqnes the IFE can be smaller and definitely lower resolution than my tablet. Pus many way s to attach device to a seat back, zero need to hold in hands. YMMV, but a comforrable seat always worth more than IFE IMO, as one can always bring a book (real, audio or e-reader).
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top