Search results

You've got your narrative and apparently you're entitled to keep harping on about it no matter how blinkered and lacking in objective support it may be. I'm sure you'll be equally vocal in complaining about worsening economic inequality and diminished public safety over the many years ahead.

Well done NSW. Surely there can be no cases among the roughly 7.5 million people not tested.

He was hoping to be played by Jeff Goldblum, but ended up with Dustin Hoffman.

You might like to think at least a little harder about your probability here...

Where’s the fruitcake button when you need one...

I wouldn't be making plans for anything much before 16th September if I lived in Melbourne...

It’s hard to make the case for honoring the memory of someone who died saying “I can’t breathe” by increasing the risk of people getting pneumonia and dying on ventilators.

It's such a ridiculous way to look at things. May as well just keep blaming China since everything can presumably be genomically linked back that far. If someone in Sydney passes it on to someone in Sydney, pretty pointless blaming some upstream source in Melbourne. And this psychology of blame...

Some church ritual? If you meant something else, maybe dispense with the cowardly innuendo and just say it.

That’s a really strange number to take comfort from given that 327/363 are still being investigated.

Perhaps calm down a little rather than reading so much into what is just a paraphrasing of one comment? 'Striving towards zero cases' is hardly incompatible with *any* strategy.

It doesn't have to be as extreme as that... there are those who posit that even just previous exposure to the common cold may have conferred a degree of cross-immunity.

Kinda like Ali G. But unfortunately your anti-vaxx impersonation is just as unbelievable as your repeated attempts at pretending you’re an in-demand consultant on frequent flyer programs.

(bolding yours) Is the information really all that much more powerful when bolded and accompanied by 37 exclamation marks? You seem to be unravellingoz.

If that's how you feel about, what, 500 active cases out of a population of around 5 million with high levels of testing, then good luck letting the rest of the world in.

Since you brought expertise into it, what particular expertise do you bring to the table?

He’s even been known to keep a log.

So to summarize, not an especially attractive opportunity even during peacetime, and then there’s that pesky “lending money for a year to an airline that’s already gone bankrupt once and now faces the worst crisis in the history of aviation” element. Sensational.

The elephant seems to be in your head rather than in the room. "How would they know?" can hardly be considered persuasive evidence.

If it continues, yes. If not, more evidence that a lot of the initial epidemiological modelling was out by orders of magnitude.