Search results

Lame two decades ago, lame now: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/revocation-of-independence/ And an insult to John Cleese.

Thank you for confirming that you are--unsurprisingly--unable to substantiate your claim to the effect that

For some reason RAM is privy to all sorts of information that can never be found in writing or accessed by anyone else. Like when it comes to the massive influx of foreign (worse still, non-Caucasian!) "close relatives".

When the PM says that she means she’d like those states to have zero cases. She hasn’t shown any sign of taking a more pragmatic approach.

Hands up everyone who wants MEL_Traveller to be the arbiter of mental health issues?

Maybe spend a little less time worrying about what others are allowed to do and a little more about what types of behavior it makes no sense whatsoever to prevent. Your “err on the side of safety” strategy does nothing of the sort. And what will it take to trigger it next time around? Some...

That argument is not sounding better even with extreme repetition.

The JOC is now proceeding under the assumption that the Tokyo Olympics (if any) will be held without general spectators.

Don’t give up your day job, mate. Even down 99% you must have been better at it than this.

The entitlement force is strong on this one.

They should be used to being closely tagged anyway.

Which is of course true for every single place in the world at every level of granularity. And every disease.

So basically just a small-minded "If I don't agree with what they say then stuff 'em, because I know better and any positive for someone else is a negative for me". I think Pierre-Joseph Proudhon probably had something else in mind.

Those under the doona also tend to be on a relatively sound economic footing, and rely on the less fortunate to make their hibernation possible. It's quite understandable to want to free-ride on the nation's internationally enviable public health situation. But I'm sure that those under the...

Simplistic, yes.

You might find a more receptive audience if you skipped all the fuzzy handwaving and made your points more succinctly with clearly sourced hard data.

Some people don't think in such stark binary terms and want to protect their families from economic devastation. Others may realize that there is no viable non-vaccine exit plan in place. Still others may decry the lack of scientific justification for the current approach. And there are also...

When has lack of qualifications ever stopped you?

*The* vaccine? I rest my case.

Apart from the complete lack of understanding of medical research, logistics, political maneuvering, airline economics, domestic coordination issues, international coordination issues, and other geopolitical realities, you could be right. Yeah, nah.