Well, its news to me that 'tech crew' ARE pilots (and only pilots)
		
		
	 
A recent 
explanation from 
@jb747 
	
		
	
	
		
		
			There's absolutely no proof it was a decision made by this "exec"
		
		
	 
This must be the first time a QF "exec" has been seen leaving the ivory tower at 10 Bourke St for an operational reason..... 
 
 
	
		
	
	
		
		
			It's in the award that duty travel pilots travel in the highest class of travel that is offered on the flight so if the highest cabin in J and the cabin is full then commercial pax unfortunately get downgraded.
		
		
	 
No issues there. But why not just simply explain to the passenger the reason of the downgrade - at the scene.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			For me, service recovery is more than just making sure that I get to the right place eventually, it also means making the traveller whole
		
		
	 
For me service recovery starts with being transparent/honest with the passenger. It does not seem to be a Qantas KPI. It seems to have "Corporate social responsibility" only in certain popular matters, missing in other equally important matters.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			Thank you for your understanding
		
		
	 
Messages like these are terribly condescending, distasteful and disrespectful.
If I ever sent a message like this to a hospital patient, i would be out of a job.
I don't want points. i want to be treated with respect. Compensation can never replace a lack of respect. Something that Qantas needs to understand but I'm afraid won't when they can just throw a few 
crumbs points at passengers.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			Qantas doesn't care about customers
		
		
	 
Does not care about anyone. It is the epitome of arrogance in many respects.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			the real question that needs to be addressed is
		
		
	 
The real question that needs addressing is when is QF going to operate internationally out of ADL?. ...
	
		
	
	
		
		
			we just received another email apologising
		
		
	 
Was this as a reply to subsequent correspondence from you?
>>>To QF: Now that was not so hard, was it. <<<
How much better if the "Exec" was transparent in the first place.....
	
		
	
	
		
		
			the glaring need for an EU261 equivalent in Australian law
		
		
	 
The glaring need for companies to operate ethically
	
		
	
	
		
		
			it’s worth noting that the FO is on an annual salary of a little under $64,000pa
		
		
	 
They could go to the US now and earn substantially more