VA and NZ threaten to "immediately unwind" partnership

Status
Not open for further replies.

leemin

Active Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Posts
508
Qantas
Gold
Virgin
Platinum
As reported in The Oz today:
Virgin Australia and Air New Zealand want the competition regulator to lift a restriction requiring them to maintain capacity across the Tasman and have warned they will "immediately unwind" their partnership if it is not reauthorised at the end of the year.

The airlines have applied to the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission to have their trans-Tasman joint venture, approval for which expires in December, extended for a further five years.

They warn they will immediately take steps to unwind the alliance if reauthorisation is not granted, a move they argue would see them cut capacity to reflect reduced demand.

They say in their application to the ACCC there is evidence of substantial public benefits from the alliance, including increased access to existing flight frequencies, a rise in online connection options and a better schedule spread. They argue they have delivered substantial public benefits "without any anti-competitive detriment on the Tasman or on any individual route".


This includes an increase in the volume and proportion of lead-in and sales fares sold on flights, although they claim commercial confidentiality and do not make public the reduction on average fares.

Capacity on the Tasman also increased by 5 per cent in "a highly competitive market characterised by substantial capacity and strong fare competition".

However, they argue that the conditions under the original deal requiring the airlines to maintain a basic level of capacity are no longer necessary.

These could create significant distortions and inefficiencies in the provision of trans-Tasman services that could increase costs and be to the detriment of consumers.

They also reduce the ability of the applicants to respond flexibly to changes in demand, with the partners noting regulators took six months to respond to a request to vary flights after the Christchurch earthquake in 2011.

But the airlines contend minimum capacity requirements should be retained for rivals Qantas-Emirates.

The ACCC has given Qantas-Emirates the green light providing the alliance maintains capacity on four key routes. The airlines have yet to receive the go-ahead from the New Zealand competition regulator.

"Notwithstanding, where the net public benefit position is finely balanced, such capacity conditions are appropriate so as to deliver the overall net public benefit," the submission says.

"This is particularly true where there is already substantial capacity in the market and in the potential simultaneous capacity conditions on the overlapping routes of Qantas and Emirates."

Virgin is still awaiting ACCC approval for its move to buy a 60 per cent stake in Tiger Airways Australia, a move that has raised concerns it would create an entrenched airline duopoly but could see the demise of the low-cost carrier if it is not permitted.

Puffing of chests or serious threat?
 
Capacity does seem to be an issue across the ditch, at present its at unsustainable levels.
 
This article is a massive beat-up. There are two separate issues the article is pretending are connected.

1.Virgin Australia and Air New Zealand want the competition regulator to lift a restriction requiring them to maintain capacity across the Tasman
2.They warn they will immediately take steps to unwind the alliance if reauthorisation is not granted

The way the article is written it sounds like the second part is a threat related to the first. If you read the submission or simply read the article with your brain switched on it isn't. They are applying to have the capacity restrictions lifted as part of an application they have to do because the agreement is only approved until December. If the ACCC refuses to continue their alliance they will obviously not be legally able to continue with the arrangement and will have to unwind it.

Unless i've missed something they are not saying "Drop the capacity requirement or we'll end the alliance" which seems to be what the article is written to imply.
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Agree with 777s reading of it.

Still a bit rich to argue for no capacity restrictions, yet at the same time say QF.EK need them
 
Still a bit rich to argue for no capacity restrictions, yet at the same time say QF.EK need them

Flip side of that is that they've had capacity restrictions for 3 years so maybe expect QF/EK to serve their time before asking for theirs to be lifted?
 
Still a bit rich to argue for no capacity restrictions, yet at the same time say QF.EK need them
That's the bit that meant I didn't take it to be as simple as 777's reading. Notwithstanding the fact I think he is probably correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Enhance your AFF viewing experience!!

From just $6 we'll remove all advertisements so that you can enjoy a cleaner and uninterupted viewing experience.

And you'll be supporting us so that we can continue to provide this valuable resource :)


Sample AFF with no advertisements? More..
Back
Top