Manchester to charge 'tourist tax' on hotel stays

Cairns City Council and other local councils are trying to do this as well....so far Anna is winning the fight, as she promised no new taxes, a few new levies but that is different...
 
I think there is a case for a tourism tax. Especially in popular tourist areas. Infrastructure is often not paid by the user and is often inadequate to support tourism which can be seen as additional population. Profits from tourism often do not trickle down to infrastructure funding. However, I have not come across a government who is excellent/honest at handling tax revenue that the money raised is actually used for the purpose for which it was intended.
 
Last edited:
There are already plenty of European cities doing this. (Not that I agree with this, I don't think governments should be charging tourists a nightly tax unless the purpose is to reduce the number of visitors in places with over-tourism!)
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Geneva has this and I'm not opposed to it because those staying overnight at accommodation get a free public transport voucher to get around.
 
Given that any tax is mostly used to enrich politicians and bureaucrats and to curry favour with favoured interest groups, instead of for any useful purpose, the only outcome of such a tourist tax would be to disincentivise tourism to the region. Thus damaging the tourism industry. Unintended consequences strike again.
 
In most places the tax is included in the price and most people don't even know they're paying for it.

In the US, tax is not included but there is already an expectation that tax will be added, so again, most people won't be aware of the individual break down of taxes.

I also agree this will have almost zero impact to tourism
 
I think there is a case for a tourism tax. Especially in popular tourist areas. Infrastructure is often not paid by the user and is often inadequate to support tourism which can be seen as additional population. Profits from tourism often do not trickle down to infrastructure funding. However, I have not come across a government who is excellent/honest at handling tax revenue that the money raised is actually used for the purpose for which it was intended.

I wouldn't mind a hotel 'tourist tax' applied here in Tas, as long as it goes to the local council, not the state govt. Where I live, the east coast, we get a gazillion tourists coming in, using infrastructure and services provided by the local council with a low population and rate base.

$1-2 a night a room wouldn't be noticed.
 
$1-2 a night a room wouldn't be noticed.

The city tax often does go noticed because it's not included in the price.

For example, at many hotels in Europe, I've been told at checkout that the room is already paid but they still need to collect the city tax (usually around €2.50 or so per night) and how do I want to pay it. I can't not notice that ;)
 

Enhance your AFF viewing experience!!

From just $6 we'll remove all advertisements so that you can enjoy a cleaner and uninterupted viewing experience.

And you'll be supporting us so that we can continue to provide this valuable resource :)


Sample AFF with no advertisements? More..
Back
Top