Search results

Fine for a single person

Excludes RAD...an extra $1M. I think that's why a lot of retirees aren't spending their super Edit: I've never heard of the organisation that produced this (news journalist is just reporting a report), and quote "medium retirement" spend $43,000 a year". I think that's below the poverty line.

Lot of words but simply mentions if you withdraw... - compare the tax rate you'll be paying outside super (d'oh) - be aware that you might trigger otherwise unrealised CGT (how ironic) (my opinion... careful about selling $25cba shares you might still have, be selective, be aware selling selling...

Not mel. Maybe ATC shortages.

CAL54 BNE-TPE seems to be heading to MEL seems to be heading to MEL

They perforated his bladder inserting the catheter?? Well done your Dad, a great survivor. And Concord did well, nice to know.

"Despite having travel insurance with Allianz, the couple has learned it doesn't cover losses related to agency insolvency." Seems to be a common exclusion now.

They still are. I think that when people become or are just a little over the $3m will withdraw (if only to avoid compliance/valuation costs)...buy lifestyle assets, home improvements or home upgrade et c. But don't sell those CBA shares you bought for $25 Super is not an investment, it's a...

Your photos seem to have so much more depth, making usual photos seem quite 2D (even though I'm looking at them on a phone)

Did you do an est. solar without batteries?

It's been over 20 years so might be different now (used to be made in Au) but Actil were/are great if you like thick white cotton sheets.

Pied-a-terre in Rome? Or a second-hand caravan 😁

Thanks, checked aircanada, lots of ways, my next VA flight I'll put in my Aeroplan number instead of Velocity and see if that generates Aeroplan points. (US amex... too complicated)

Ah. So what I wrote in post 1108 ..."My "cunning plan" to max the expiry date of the Aeroplan points is to leave some (min 1000) points in SA then convert them to Aeroplan points in 14 months" won't work and no way around it.

That's not what I expected at all! And not want I want. Any way to prevent that?

"Japanese GP, I can't watch that without falling asleep" Love it.

Good pickup. I'm glad these are Allianz "plain language" contracts Plain Language Contracts launches with certification for Allianz Partners, Youi - Insurance News - insuranceNEWS.com.au

I did consider that definition, i.e. "return" meaning coming back rather than the common airline usage of both ways, but still thought that Citi's definition to include the "and" in their definition..."ticket departing from and returning" (as distinct from "a return ticket") precluded or may...

What you were advised verbally certainly makes practical sense. But it's not their definition, which is in the singular. Hopefully the assessor would also be practical and not use their literal definition as stated. As you say, would be nice in writing.

Good reminder, if you activate Citi ins by the $500 spend then you still need a return overseas ticket. Not 2 x one way. But surely having a return au-singapore ticket then complies, regardless of how/where you travel after. Citi Definitions: return overseas travel ticket - means an air or...