Search results

Depends. UberXL would cost me $10 -$20 more to WSI than SYD. Peanuts in the scheme of things

That's their idea👍 but lots of people do foster and have a turnover of dogs.

I've always presented CC for pre-auth regardless of points usage. It's an automatic physiological reflex - passport/Amex

"Lazy enough" for many. It's just one extra step to cut out the middle man

There might be a solution

They all use a wide angle lens exaggerating the size of the rooms by bringing more of the room into the picture and distorting the size difference between the foreground and background.

How do you know that it was not a proactive pilot decision?. Maybe they were concerned?

What is AC? - you mean Air Canada?

The vast majority of comments here suggest one side is OTT

CX's new in house Wine brand (zero alcohol)

Exactly. "Taken properly" = always read the product instructions at back of box :

Prima facie I would agree. Hence my comment about the storm in a teacup. But sometimes this may benefit from a deeper analysis

I want to be picked up by Tony Fernandez I want to hear him say "there is an extra charge" when i want the AC turned up or I want to put music on radio 🤣 There is a skit about that

On the surface it may be an isolated incident But is it? were there near misses in the past? Eg FA about to give a 3yr old wine but realises before it occured? Near misses are an important indicator of latent safety issues. The company might want to delve a little deeper Maybe something lke...

Zero Overdose = liver damage. Agree On the other hand, it is simple, cheap and if taken properly poses zero harm If you like, It is the ideal placebo.

With the rebate its 23c/kWh for me (FiT zero and solar panels fully amortised)

So why fire only the FA? Are we saying that the FA's workplace is not affected by policies and procedures from higher up And you dont answer the question by terminating the FA Why? Because in the future all FA will be hesitant to speak up about near misses or failures in the future for fear...

Whereas the correct way is to 1) Discover the root cause 2) Analyse the contributing factors - individual, organisational, regulatory 3) Propose a solution 4) Implement the solution 5) Measure the outcome This is actually how it should be done in any quality assurance process.

I think the sums are excellent I estimate that I will save $33,000 over 10 years.