Registered Users have the option of removing this |
Longer trip than normal for QF73 today![]()
Now if they could just figure out how to supply fuel and controls to the 5th engine, they could make it shorter tripThen the extra 20% thrust would more than compensate for the extra drag ... but the extra fuel burn may result in "landing" somewhat sort of the planned destination
![]()
NM aka Nelly Mobbs
Although not common incidents, give more sway to those 4 engined QF planes than the 2 engined V-Aus ones.
NM aka Nelly Mobbs
Ah, better to be late than dead.
Like when I see people running across George St in Sydney traffic against the don't walk to save 15 seconds and have a higher risk of death and maiming. Personally I prefer to reduce my risk and be 15 seconds late.
Everyone has a different measurement of what's important.
Matt
Unlike Piston engines, Jet engines have a higher probability of failure for aircraft with 4 than 2.
Keep in mind no aircraft has suffered two independent engine failures that would not have failed 4 had the aircraft been a 4 banger, in which case having two or 4 would have made no difference, other than affecting the gliding rate of descent.
VH-OJQ is on its way to rescue its predecessor at SFO after arriving from JNB, here is a picture of it as a 5 banger landing in Sydney in case you have never seen one, you tend to look twice before noticing the extra bits!
Photos: Boeing 747-438 Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)