Oh no - dreamlifter lands at the wrong airport

Status
Not open for further replies.
You (or a mod) may want to amend the thread title - the aircraft is a Dreamlifter, not a Dreamliner.

It's an 1800m runway, albeit narrow - a light 747 won't have trouble getting out of there if it needed to.
 
Actually it is a Dreamlifter, not a Dreamliner, totally different planes.

Will be very interesting to see how they get it out of there.
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

And it has left with very little fuss in the end.

A 747 pilot friend of mine on another forum posted this:

Just take all the freight out of it, put 15 tonnes of fuel in it, use full power and I'd be surprised if it uses more than half the runway to get off. They have really good performance when empty - To give you an idea of how much grunt they have, a 747 can carry its own weight in fuel and then some payload on top of that as well.
So in car terms, it's like getting a four-seater car, putting a person in every seat and then another complete car on top of it and then expecting it to perform - which they do fairly well. So empty they have quite a substantial amount of power.

Needless to say he wasn't surprised it took off without too much fuss.

edit - posted this as well.

A quick story of how easy it is to land at the wrong airport.
The 747 mob I used to fly for had a bit of an incident one day when landing in Lagos, Nigeria. It was the middle of the night, they arrived over the top of the airport and were heading on the outbound leg of the instrument approach and the tower gave them the 'clear to land' instruction. As they were heading outbound for a couple of minutes and descending all the power went out at the airport and surrounds. However, the local military airport still had power (diesel generators) and so was still all lit up nicely. So when they made the turn to come back inbound all they could see was the military runway lit up so they headed for it. It's a surprisingly easy mistake to make.
So they landed (plane was full of Hajji's) and saw that the far end of the runway was coming up at them pretty quickly so the Captain stomped on the brakes to make it pull up in time, which it did. A quick moment of panic and they figured out that they'd landed on the wrong runway & airport so they turned the big aeroplane around, set the flaps, did some quick calculations for the speeds and away they went at full thrust. On landing at the correct airport (power back on of course) they blew a heap of tyres because they were all overheated from the one big stop plus another stop a short time later, so the plane was beached just after it left the runway.
But their problems didn't stop there ... Because they'd landed at a military airport the military types all woke up and got a bit excited. As the 747 was getting ready to leave their little runway they all piled into cars & trucks to go out to the runway to find out WTF was going on. But just as The Colonel in his jeep (they bought a Jeep) got to the end of the runway and was unfortunately behind the 747 as the the crew gave it full power ... which did blow the jeep over. No real injuries fortunately and a small pile of money was handed over to smooth things over.

I'm guessing wrong airport landings happen a bit more than reported :D
 
Last edited:
Journalism at it's best :rolleyes:[h=2]"The mammoth plane needs 9,199 feet of runway to take off at maximum weight"[/h]
 

Would love to have been in the tower when they reported landing but could not be seen. Looks like the airports have a similar setup to Melbourne and Essendon, where the runways are pretty much on the same heading but given different numbers to help prevent confusion, pity that does not help at night. Given the aircraft is 23 years old ex China Airlines, I don't think a moving map display was part of the conversion package.
 
I wonder what the pilot told his boss in the incident report.
 
Would love to have been in the tower when they reported landing but could not be seen. Looks like the airports have a similar setup to Melbourne and Essendon, where the runways are pretty much on the same heading but given different numbers to help prevent confusion, pity that does not help at night. Given the aircraft is 23 years old ex China Airlines, I don't think a moving map display was part of the conversion package.

I do have some memory of a Malaysian? 777 (from memory) lining up to land at Essendon some years ago before a fairly last minute realisation that it was the wrong airport! Or is this wrong?
 
I do have some memory of a Malaysian? 777 (from memory) lining up to land at Essendon some years ago before a fairly last minute realisation that it was the wrong airport! Or is this wrong?

There have been quite a few, Garuda in particular tried to make a habit of it for a while, and its why there are strobe lights at MEL, on a particular approach it was required to report sighting the "running rabbit" before a landing clearance would be given, not sure if that's still the case.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...FBVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=iJUDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4026,5743605

In the case of the Atlas Crew on the Dreamliner, I expect they would be given a Delta briefing:

D on't
E ver
L and
T here
A gain. :D
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Enhance your AFF viewing experience!!

From just $6 we'll remove all advertisements so that you can enjoy a cleaner and uninterupted viewing experience.

And you'll be supporting us so that we can continue to provide this valuable resource :)


Sample AFF with no advertisements? More..
Back
Top