VA 2IC criticises alleged high Australian airport fees and charges

Status
Not open for further replies.

Melburnian1

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Posts
24,673
VA's 2IC has publicly criticised what a layman might call (alleged) 'price gouging' at Australia's major airports:

Airport profits out of kilter, says Virgin Australia

Although the ACCC has also been critical, it is not clear what pressure can be brought to bear on these airports. There is no price regulation as far as I know.

On the plus side, privatisation has seen massive increases in passengers handled and a lot of investment, although whether it is 'sufficient' and directed at the 'right' areas is an interesting topic.

However as many of us know, the privatised airports make more money from non-aeronautical revenues than from the airlines as such. Examples include sky high car parking fees as well as a concentration on retailing at airports. If any of us walk through Melbourne Airport's international walkway through its duty free - a circuitous route for passengers - that concentration slaps us in the face, as it does in SYD and elsewhere.

It's surprising that the domestic airlines have taken so long - 20 years to form a lobby group. Internationally, the Board of Airline Representatives in Australia is long established.

Some might suggest that the domestic airlines have some pricing power, as shown by how median airfares are currently rising. So they may be able to pass on increased airport costs to their passengers.
 
How much profit do the airports make?

If the airports are such cash cows, maybe VA should buy one? Perhaps it could build a new Sydney one then?

Government probably makes more money than the owners do.
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

"During the last four years alone, investors have been pleased to support more than $1.8 billion in new and upgraded infrastructure "

So cost of airport - billions - plus 1.8 billion in the next 4 years... Unless there is a big windfall around the corner 260 million profit doesn't seem super extravagant. It's good don't get me wrong, it's not "we're counting pennies while they're all in mansions on the back of our hard work" good though.
Sydney profit up 400% so it's more like $60 million (usually) on something worth billions.

If airports were such easy money maybe VA should have gotten into them instead.

Let's not also forget the value of the airports has also been dumb luck, just like all Sydney + Melbourne properties. If they knew 15 years ago how much increase was ahead they'd have bought up big.

- Interest rates are record low
- Passenger numbers are record high
- Land value is record high

Everything going airports way right now. Could be a whole different ballgame in the future.

Edit: Not that I think privatising much is a good idea, obviously the interest is to make profit, not serve the public.
 
Last edited:
How much profit do the airports make?


Lots, but I think the fundamental point behind all this is that the consumer benefits from the privitisation of the airports have been extremely poor to non-existant.
 
Lots, but I think the fundamental point behind all this is that the consumer benefits from the privitisation of the airports have been extremely poor to non-existant.

Of course, is there even 1 example where privatising something has made it cheaper for consumers in the long run?
 
Keep in mind that those are net profit numbers

They're not bad. Keep in mind though:

- Record high passenger numbers (consumer spending is up in general - more retail and parking $ too)
- Record high property prices
- Record low interest rates
- Profitable AU airlines

Absolutely everything is going their way right now.

RE: privitisation, land is so expensive now there is simply no way for anyone to compete unless they're going to build an airport 100km away, it's a monopoly. There could only be 1 outcome in this situation.

Unless I'm mistaken both airports are publicly traded, VA could invest all their money into them if they are so profitable.
 
Unfortunately not
But MEL is majority owned by I think 4-5 Australian fund managers. A lot of super is tied up there. Through diversification, exposure is less per super fund member.

My point is that this particular piece of infrastructure is contributing to super returns for many super accounts.
 
Happy to be corrected, but I believe Macquarie Bank are the largest shareholder in Sydney Airport Holdings (ASX : SYD) due mostly to the fact that they own the lease for the airport.

Read into that what you will....
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top