- Joined
- Jan 29, 2012
- Posts
- 15,272
- Qantas
- LT Gold
- Virgin
- Red
"An airport for Melbourne's Dockland's precinct has been proposed by a parliamentary committee after a taxpayer-funded overseas summer jaunt."
Herald Sun
Herald Sun
The parliamentary committee might like to check the populations of either city... while London could be said to be only double Melbourne, depending on how big an area you sample it ranges to about 4x the size. So I doubt such a small population needs a city airport.
Also strange that they'd suggest a city airport for LCC's... I'd just imagine it'd be harder to recoup costs from them, take longer etc...
And that Essendon airport is closer to Melbourne than LCY is to London.
Not really.And that Essendon airport is closer to Melbourne than LCY is to London.
Sorry for the inaccuracy. I based my comment on the Herald Sun article - more fool me!Not really.
London to LCY is only 8 miles (12.9km). Melbourne CBD to MEB is 14.5km.
LCY is also serviced by the DLR, which goes from Bank, and has either Heron Quays or Canary Wharf DLR stations connecting straight into the Jubilee line.
Public transport to LCY is dead simple (and cheap) from downtown. It's also stupidly close to Canary Wharf, which is arguably the financial capital of London (if not most of Europe). LCY makes sense on a lot of levels. An airport at the Docklands? Tell 'em they're dreamin'!
Ahh you trusted the HunSorry for the inaccuracy. I based my comment on the Herald Sun article - more fool me!
Incidentally, there is lots of public derision in the same paper this morning.
I like the idea.
If we can't take Mohammed to the mountain; let's take the airport to the train station.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements