Lufthansa sues no-show passengers [Hidden City Ticketed]

Discussion in 'Travel News' started by Mattg, Feb 7, 2019.

Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyer and Travel Resource!
Our site contains tons of information that will improve your travel experience.
Joining AFF is fast, simple & ABSOLUTELY FREE -  join now by clicking on the JOIN NOW button, and take immediate advantage of these great BENEFITS.
Once registered, this box will disappear. And you will see fewer advertisements :)
  1. Mattg

    Mattg Senior Member

    Aug 21, 2011
    7,427
    4,524
    AMS
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    I saw this article on a German news website and found it really interesting.

    Lufthansa verklagt No-Show-Passagiere

    Basically, German airline Lufthansa is taking a stand against passengers that use hidden-city and other ticketing tricks to get cheaper airfares and then not fly part of their booked journey.

    For example, it might be cheaper to book CPH-FRA-JFK than it is to book FRA-JFK, so some German passengers will book ex Copenhagen. Obviously, you need to then get to Copenhagen at the start of the trip or the remaining flights will automatically cancelled. But on the way home, some passengers are simply leaving the airport in Frankfurt and not taking the last flight. Lufthansa now wants to charge these passengers a fare difference penalty retrospectively.

    I personally don't intentionally skip booked flights, but if this catches on it's nonetheless a quite concerning trend!

    I couldn't find any English versions of this article so I've translated the first few paragraphs, to give you an idea:

     
    • Informative Informative x 4

  2. Pushka

    Pushka Enthusiast

    Jan 26, 2011
    14,409
    14,906
    ADL MEL
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    People can become very unwell after disembarkation. That’s my thought. Obviously luggage needs to be considered.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. JohnK

    JohnK Veteran Member

    Mar 22, 2005
    40,634
    8,849
    BNE, SYD and CNX
    When it starts to become a trend then it's not a good thing. I see nothing wrong penalising serial offenders but as @Pushka mentions people can get sick after disembarking and travel at a later time.
     
  4. Mattg

    Mattg Senior Member

    Aug 21, 2011
    7,427
    4,524
    AMS
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    That is of course true. I don't think these are the kinds of people that airlines are trying to go after.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. ozfflyer

    ozfflyer Junior Member

    Dec 22, 2018
    40
    6
    all huff & puff by Lufthansa. Doubt if any passenger will have to pay anything.

    NOTE: you can only hvae hand luggage if doing this & don't take a lot of hand luggage, just in case the flight attendants insist it goes into the hold.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. lovetravellingoz

    lovetravellingoz Senior Member

    Jul 13, 2006
    5,634
    1,503
    MEL
    I think that they may be after those that get "unwell" on a regular basis.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. ozfflyer

    ozfflyer Junior Member

    Dec 22, 2018
    40
    6
    they won't have much chance of getting any funds. They have to be careful they don't piss off regular flyers. Plenty of airlines out there.

    They might "win the battle & lose the war"
     
  8. Cruiser Elite

    Cruiser Elite Senior Member

    Oct 31, 2010
    9,915
    8,501
    Melburn
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    PR disaster in the air - tabloids - “LH sues pax for not flying but keeps their money” - Joe / Josey Public will be scratcing his / her head
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. JohnK

    JohnK Veteran Member

    Mar 22, 2005
    40,634
    8,849
    BNE, SYD and CNX
    Or "LH sues selfish passengers breaking the rules"?

    Just because and airfare out of CPH is cheaper than out of FRA doesn't mean that you can book it and choose to end journey at FRA. Then book again and choose to end journey in FRA. And again. And again. And again.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. MEL_Traveller

    MEL_Traveller Enthusiast

    Apr 27, 2005
    17,602
    5,313
    Melbourne, AU
    There is precedent. BA is already doing this for pax on cheaper ex-Euro fares. The airline can also close FF accounts with points being forfeited. (The latter being a much easier option.)

    There's no PR issue here as these are 'sophisticated' flyers. The general public doesn't have any affinity.

    Whether LH has the legal basis to do this is something that may no dount get tested.
     
  11. henleybeach

    henleybeach Member

    Mar 7, 2015
    364
    676
    Adelaide
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    I’m guilty of doing this once .
    Last year CPH to IST direct with Turkish airlines was around $460 , CPH - BUH via IST was $175. I choose the connecting flight with a long overnight layover. We checked in and ask our bags to be check to IST as we were staying in a hotel for our transit and it was no problem . We did fly out the next day , just not with Turkish airlines.
     
  12. glasszon

    glasszon Member

    Jul 30, 2015
    238
    69
    While suing those customers might not 100% cause a PR disaster, but there's always that risk because the general public believe when they buy a ticket from A-B-C, it's the same as buying a ticket from A-B and B-C, most wouldn't know contractually, you are buying a ticket from A-C and it just so happens you transit at B, so public opinions will be against the Airline should the media pick up the story in a big way.
     
  13. MEL_Traveller

    MEL_Traveller Enthusiast

    Apr 27, 2005
    17,602
    5,313
    Melbourne, AU
    I disagree on this. If a 'regular passenger' buys a ticket CPH-JFK they are not expecting they have two separate tickets CPH-FRA and FRA-JFK. They search as a single ticket and that's what they are given. Same with a QF flight MEL-LAX... I don't think any member of the public thinks they have two completely separate tickets?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. glasszon

    glasszon Member

    Jul 30, 2015
    238
    69
    You will be surprised, you should have a read on people's Airline reviews, most of the 1 star rating are things that are taken for granted on this forum, but not necessarily true for the general public.

    Regarding the "regular passenger" part, I totally agree they know what they are getting themselves into, but the question is can you convey that message to the general public. It's like the big media company suing people using bittorrent for copyright violations and bankrupting those people in the process, sure they have won the legal battle, but have they won the heart of the general public?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. MEL_Traveller

    MEL_Traveller Enthusiast

    Apr 27, 2005
    17,602
    5,313
    Melbourne, AU
    I think it's a fairly easy sell. BA doesn't seem to have any issues on the PR front. Particularly because the general public aren't caught out by these things (so it makes no difference to them.)

    And bear in mind the closest most of the general public get to flying business class, regardless of the deal, is reading about it on news . com . au So once you throw into the mix that this is only affecting first and business class passengers the sympathy goes out the window to a large extent (same as mistake fares, the argument is that this will be a PR disaster if the airline doesn't honour it, but in reality most passengers wouldn't even be able to relate to it).
     
  16. glasszon

    glasszon Member

    Jul 30, 2015
    238
    69
    Before I start, I am currently preparing for a test that involves critical reasoning, so I am trying to do as much logical arguments as possible, apologies in advance if I went too far....

    I agree the chance of this becoming a big PR incident is small, but it's always a risk when you sue a paying customer. Unlike mistake fares where you don't lose out if the Airline cancel the fare beside not being able to fly, contrast that with taking a customer to court where the customer will incur legal fees to defend the charge.

    I am not familiar with the German legal system but from what I can read using google translate, the Airline has appealed the verdict from the district court and it is not cheap to defend an action that has been appealed further up and can literally bankrupt people.
     
  17. williamsf1

    williamsf1 Established Member

    Jun 1, 2010
    1,169
    233
    Berlin
  18. JohnK

    JohnK Veteran Member

    Mar 22, 2005
    40,634
    8,849
    BNE, SYD and CNX
    The general public don't look for ways to exploit the rules. This is mainly done by people who play the status game.

    e.g. a SYD family wanting to holiday in Thailand looks for airfares ex-SYD. They don't go searching for airfares ex-CBR or ex-MEL and then trying to get to/from that destination.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. Happy Dude

    Happy Dude Active Member

    Oct 13, 2006
    905
    201
    CBR
    Well perhaps if the airlines didn't have such illogical pricing......
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  20. Happy Trails

    Happy Trails Established Member

    Jun 8, 2010
    2,222
    1,531
    Up Country Thailand
    Perfectly logical...
    ...if you're an airline.:)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
Loading...

Share This Page