Home
Latest News
Airlines, Miles and Points
Coronavirus & Travel
Non-Airline Loyalty Programs
Travel Lifestyle
Trip Reports & Reviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Member Services
Award Flight Assist
AFF on AIR Podcast
Frequent Flyer Training
Frequent Flyer Webinars
Credit Card Points Transfer
Seat Comparison
AFF Supporter Benefits
AFF Gazette
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Forums
Coronavirus & Travel
Coronavirus (COVID-19)
And we thought being double vaxxed meant something...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Telemachus" data-source="post: 2321626" data-attributes="member: 81578"><p>Another day, another rule change but this is a genuine improvement. The promised <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/1382/made" target="_blank">amendment to the SI</a> came into force on 9 Dec though the Gov.UK guidance hasn't yet caught up. So there is now no discrimination against foreign vaccination in the treatment of close contacts for isolation. They have removed the anomaly (which had been there since 16 Aug) by specifying that vaccinations under the UK overseas programme are acceptable, and by aligning the definition of 'authorised vaccine' with the long list of recognised countries and proof of vaccination documents previously enacted for arrivals from overseas.</p><p></p><p>This removes some but not all of the risk of 10 days' mandatory isolation if one were to be identified as a close contact. We are now in the same boat as UK-vaccinated people, which though good news in principle means the 10 days of isolation will still apply (for the time being) to close contacts of an Omicron case.</p><p></p><p>Cold comfort to this thread's OP and to others caught up in the unjustified categorisation of all foreign-immunised people - in the context of isolation of close contacts - as though they were unvaccinated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Telemachus, post: 2321626, member: 81578"] Another day, another rule change but this is a genuine improvement. The promised [URL='https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/1382/made']amendment to the SI[/URL] came into force on 9 Dec though the Gov.UK guidance hasn't yet caught up. So there is now no discrimination against foreign vaccination in the treatment of close contacts for isolation. They have removed the anomaly (which had been there since 16 Aug) by specifying that vaccinations under the UK overseas programme are acceptable, and by aligning the definition of 'authorised vaccine' with the long list of recognised countries and proof of vaccination documents previously enacted for arrivals from overseas. This removes some but not all of the risk of 10 days' mandatory isolation if one were to be identified as a close contact. We are now in the same boat as UK-vaccinated people, which though good news in principle means the 10 days of isolation will still apply (for the time being) to close contacts of an Omicron case. Cold comfort to this thread's OP and to others caught up in the unjustified categorisation of all foreign-immunised people - in the context of isolation of close contacts - as though they were unvaccinated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Coronavirus & Travel
Coronavirus (COVID-19)
And we thought being double vaxxed meant something...
Top