Interlining QF/MH

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Posts
190
Qantas
Platinum
Any chance they'd refuse interline for the following itinerary booked on 2 separate tickets?

SYD-CGK (QF41)
CGK-KUL (MH724)

This seems to be one of the easiest (cheapest) way to get to KUL on OW but obviously isn't sold on QF website.
 
Depending on your dates, the current MH price drop seemingly only visible through skyscanner are same/cheaper for some dates than the fares showing through CGK. e.g Jul 21 next year showing $2464 for direct flight.

I picked up a Y fare multi-city Mel-Kul-Hkt return with transit stop for $773 yesterday for Jul 21st on skyscanner when the MH site said $869.
 
Any chance they'd refuse interline for the following itinerary booked on 2 separate tickets?

SYD-CGK (QF41)
CGK-KUL (MH724)

This seems to be one of the easiest (cheapest) way to get to KUL on OW but obviously isn't sold on QF website.

On two separate revenue tickets, there's every chance they would refuse to check through luggage from Sydney to Kuala Lumpur.

However, in reverse, MH would likely be willing to check the luggage through.
 
Slight side question - what is the operational reason that airlines like Qantas don't want to check the luggage through in these situations?. Does it cost them money somewhere along the line - like are they liable for some kind of handling fee at the connecting airport? I don't understand what the negatives are for them, and it's such a big benefit for the traveller.
 
Changed mid-2016

Basically, first carrier as the check-in carrier responsible for the loss, even if they didn't lose the bag, and also all the staff time involved etc.

By booking two separate tickets rather than a codeshare, they don't get revenue on the second segment yet are taking risk.
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Slight side question - what is the operational reason that airlines like Qantas don't want to check the luggage through in these situations?. Does it cost them money somewhere along the line - like are they liable for some kind of handling fee at the connecting airport? I don't understand what the negatives are for them, and it's such a big benefit for the traveller.
It's not just baggage.
If they check you through then they can be responsible if you miss your connecting flight.
Whereas usually on separate tickets it would be completely on your own head.
 
QF won't check through in such a case, unless one of the tickets is an award and the other a revenue ticket.
Oneworld used to require cross booking thru check between oneworld members, until it was changed a few years ago, reportedly at the "request" of BA. People had been booking cheap flights out of the UK to the mainland, then turning around and flying back through the UK on a cheaper ticket. eg LCY-AMS/AMS-LHR-LAX and expecting BA to check through and take larger risks with less payment.
Now the airlines are only required to check through on the same booking, though they may chose to do more and check across bookings if they chose. JL and CX will. I'm not sure if it has been confirmed if MH will.

Costs related to connections is also why some low cost carriers don't offer connections and require people to collect and recheck after each flight. Though I'm not sure how taking a bag from aircraft to baggage claim costs less then taking a bag from an aircraft to another aircraft.

I just flew LIS-LHR-DOH-PHL-ATL (BA-QR-QR-AA). BA checked me through all the way to ATL. If BA misplaced my bags at LHR, I wouldn't know it until I got to CBP in PHL, at which point I would have talked to QR about my missing bags. QR would then be paying to sort out BA's problem.
If that trip had PHL-ATL on a different booking and BA checked me through, AA would know I'm coming and I would just be able to drop bags on the transfer belt after customs rather then have to recheck with AA and new bag tags/boarding pass. Now, if QR was late causing me to miss my AA flight, QR would have to deal with it, even though BA checked me through. Where as, if they didn't check me through and QR was late, if it was a different ticket, it would be on me to deal with.
 
By booking two separate tickets rather than a codeshare, they don't get revenue on the second segment yet are taking risk.

Codeshares are not necessary, just that the flights be in the same booking - they don't need to be even on the same ticket (although commonly are on the same ticket). Good travel agents should be able to book separate tickets into the same booking. In the OP's case, even if such a travel agent can access the MH fare (which does seems to be available for sale in Australia), they couldn't put into same booking without an overnight in CGK anyway, as the Minimum Connection Time to/from Qantas at CGK is 3 hours.
 
From personal experience I find it’s a mixed bag. Have done ADL-SYD-CGK QF and then CGK-KUL-xx_ a few times on different tickets and it just must be who you get on the day but more often than than not the answer is no. Coming back the other way MH are batting at nearly 100% and are more than happy to do it
 
Slight side question - what is the operational reason that airlines like Qantas don't want to check the luggage through in these situations?. Does it cost them money somewhere along the line - like are they liable for some kind of handling fee at the connecting airport? I don't understand what the negatives are for them, and it's such a big benefit for the traveller.

The issues for Qantas go back to the Iceland Volcano, at which time they removed through check to non one world partners. There were a range of issues around delaing with disruptions, and people expecting Qantas to deal with separate tickets on other airlines that Qantas knew nothing about.

Other issues that crop up is that sometimes there is no luggage allowance on the ongoing flight, so who is on the hook for collecting that?
 
Qantas does sell tickets on their website with a MH flight on the SIN-KUL leg as opposed to 3K/JQ?
 
From personal experience I find it’s a mixed bag. Have done ADL-SYD-CGK QF and then CGK-KUL-xx_ a few times on different tickets and it just must be who you get on the day but more often than than not the answer is no. Coming back the other way MH are batting at nearly 100% and are more than happy to do it

MH has a published policy they do through check to other ow airlines. It obviously only works when you start with them and not the reverse.
 
Airlines that don't interline within the same alliance are doing it entirely for selfish financial reasons, and at the detriment of the passenger experience.

MH will interline everything within Oneworld.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top