Registered Users have the option of removing this |
Just saw this on smh.com.au
Qantas in costly court case loss
This could be a very costly loss.Originally Posted by smh.com.au
ejb
When I grow up I want a signature.
Good to hear. Maybe next the airline will stop scamming a fundamental cost of travel as an extra
That's great news...it's always amazed me how QF and other airlines could get away with including what is an operating expense as a tax...its not just a good day for TA's, its a good day for airline travellers too, hopefully it'll see the taxes on redemtions drop too.
TG
My mission is to utilise my blackbook of travel contacts to create travel experiences that will leave footprints forever on your soul
Wonder when the taxes for redemptions will drop.Originally Posted by TravelToday
That is great news.
I too couldn't work out how they argued that the fuel surcharge wasn't part of the price. It's not as if fuel wasn't a component of the ticket price before surcharges came along!
WT
Is this tussle referring to the ticketing line item YQ?
I wonder how QF - amongst other named airlines - argued in the courts as to how fuel can be considered as a non-fundamental expense and thus a tax/surcharge? Makes little sense to me (and of course this is detail which will never make the news article - only the court proceedings).
The article says QF are considering their options. Looks like their only option is to concede - the judges don't seem to be willing to grant QF any avenue for appeal, plus considering the judgement was made on basis of a precedent it also seems unlikely to continue.
According to the article, apart from QF the other airlines implicated to have also participated in the illegal practice are NZ, CX, BA, SQ and MH.
So we all expect YQ to go down (or rather, eliminated) after this? QF will hurt the most on international routes. SQ have had high taxes/charges on awards as well - is a significant portion of that YQ?
In any case, where is the compo money going? TAs get a cut; I'm assuming (perhaps too quickly) that customers that were affected (i.e. booked awards in the said timeframe) will get nothing.
anat0lMy Flight Memory | My OpenFlights | My ba97 | My FT Picture Albums
Airlines: QF Platinum / 76.00% LTS | VFF Platinum | BD Silver | NZ Silver | AA Entry | MH Blue | VS Red
Alliances: oneworld Emerald | Star Alliance Silver
Hotels: PC Platinum | HH Gold | SPG Gold
Other: Priority Pass
I don't see that the passengers would be entitled to anything back, just that TAs should be able to claim commission based on fuel finess from them
Great news and about time.
I can see fuel surcharges dropping on classic awards although I believe Qantas will increase the QFF points required for the award. Should not affect Any Seat awards other than the minimum points costs increasing.
Hopefully we will not see an increase in airfares to make up for the commission payout.
QFF Platinum (OW Emerald) 62.46% toward Lifetime Gold
Which ever way this plays out I see it as a move in the right direction. Trouble is that a few more things may need to happen to sort this though to an appropriate conclusion for the long suffering passengers.
cheers,
Bill.
QFF Platinum (OW Emerald) LTSilver & 30.21% to LTG, Velocity FF Platinum, UA Nothing, HHonors Diamond, PC Platinum RA, SPG Platinum, Hertz Gold No 1, Ansett -- nothing any more!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)