A380 wake upset: business jet at 34,000ft, lost 8,700ft in 32s, plane written off

 
Registered Users have the option of removing this and all other advertisements.  More


Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyer and Travel Resource!
(Click HERE for a welcome message from our founder.)

Our site contains tons of information that is guaranteed to improve your travel experience. Be it tips on how to fly in First/Business at a reduced cost, smart ways to earn more points, the best way to use your points, cheap deals, hand-picked hotel recommendations, detailed trip reports. A good place to start exploring our site is HERE.


We hope you find the information useful and decide to join our online community. Joining AFF is fast, simple and ABSOLUTELY FREE - so why not join now by clicking on the REGISTER link, and take immediate advantage of these great BENEFITS.

If you experience any problems, please Contact Us.

Once registered, this box will disappear freeing up more space on your screen! And you will see fewer advertisements :)
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree3Likes
  • 2 Post By jb747
  • 1 Post By Shik
Interesting/alarming report on an incident involving a Sydney bound Emirates A380 and a Bombardier Challenger business jet in January. https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...on-rou-437303/ I cannot imagine how it would feel (even if safely/firmly) ...
  1. #1
    RAM
    RAM is offline
    Established Member RAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Randwick
    Posts
    1,484
    FF Prog
    Q VFF EY Kris AAAd United Luft BA AB MH
    Blog Entries
    1

    My Travels
    Flights Recorded
    275
    Miles Flown
    546664
    Days in Aircraft
    51
    View my Flight Map

    A380 wake upset: business jet at 34,000ft, lost 8,700ft in 32s, plane written off

    Interesting/alarming report on an incident involving a Sydney bound Emirates A380 and a Bombardier Challenger business jet in January.

    https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...on-rou-437303/

    I cannot imagine how it would feel (even if safely/firmly) strapped in to your seat to drop around 300 feet a second for around 30 seconds.

    In the following second vertical acceleration changed to -3.2 g.

    By all reports everyone on the plane is lucky to be alive - the air frame has been declared a write-off.

    During the descent the aircraft's airframe exceeded the design certification load limits. Although the aircraft landed safely at Muscat, with no apparent external damage, BFU says Bombardier determined the airframe "could not be restored to an airworthy state".

    An Emirates Airbus A380-800, registration A6-EUL performing flight EK-412 from Dubai (United Arab Emirates) to Sydney,NS (Australia), was enroute at FL350 about 630nm southeast of Muscat (Oman) and about 820nm northwest of Male (Maldives) at about 08:40Z when a business jet passed underneath in opposite direction. The A380 continued the flight to Sydney without any apparent incident and landed safely.

    The business jet, a MHS Aviation (Munich) Canadair Challenger 604 registration D-AMSC performing flight MHV-604 from Male (Maldives) to Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) with 9 people on board, was enroute at FL340 over the Arabian Sea about 630nm southeast of Muscat when an Airbus A380-800 was observed by the crew passing 1000 feet above. After passing underneath the A380 at about 08:40Z the crew lost control of the aircraft as result of wake turbulence from the A380 and was able to regain control of the aircraft only after losing about 10,000 feet.

    In the following second vertical acceleration changed to -3.2 g.

    The German (English version) interim report - an interesting read to say the least (24 pages).
    Interim Report (PDF, 7MB, Not barrier-free file.)

  2.    Sponsored Links



    Registered Users have the option of removing this and all other advertisements.  More



  3. #2
    Established Member juddles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sth America
    Posts
    2,478
    FF Prog
    QF/LATAM/Avianca. Virgin? Never

    My Travels
    Flights Recorded
    873
    Miles Flown
    1155943
    Days in Aircraft
    114
    View my Flight Map

    AFF Verified Airline Status
    Qantas Status
    Platinum One
    What's this and Why?

    Re: A380 wake upset: business jet at 34,000ft, lost 8,700ft in 32s, plane written off

    I will leave it to expert pilots to make their assessment, but from a layman's understanding, this appears to be a scenario where wake turbulence caused a relatively minor hiccup (error in reaction?) from the autopilot, but the intervention by the pilots successfully resulted in a complete loss of control of the aircraft.

    I do not think that the wake turbulence 1000 ft below a passing "heavy" will by it self cause such dramatic acrobatics.

    I am not bagging the pilot here, but a casual observer of this incident may get an entirely incorrect idea of the realities.
    All I want in any class is a single mattress on the floor.

  4. #3
    Established Member Quickstatus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    4,174
    FF Prog
    QF WP (0% status run). QPub for life. VA Pooling

    Re: A380 wake upset: business jet at 34,000ft, lost 8,700ft in 32s, plane written off

    I think the wake turbulence exceeded the ability of the autopilot or pilot to correct. It spun about the longitudinal axis a few times before the pilot regained control. The report suggests that despite the correct corrective inputs the Challenger still spun out of control
    Presumably because the diameter of the wake vortex off an A380 would be greater than the wingspan of the challenger
    This was discussed previously I think?. But I can't find it.

    See this one at 2:20 onwards.
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h8fV36OtrJw

    And this one is very dramatic
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXlv16ETueU

    Though as you say there have been instances of pilot inputs exacerbating the effects of WT :See AA587


    and here is a dramatic wake vortex
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uy0hgG2pkUs
    Last edited by Quickstatus; 19th May 2017 at 10:01 PM.

  5.    Sponsored Links



    Registered Users have the option of removing this and all other advertisements.  More



  6. #4
    Senior Member jb747's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    6,079

    My Travels
    Flights Recorded
    119
    Miles Flown
    370154
    Days in Aircraft
    33
    View my Flight Map

    Re: A380 wake upset: business jet at 34,000ft, lost 8,700ft in 32s, plane written off

    Quote Originally Posted by Quickstatus View Post
    I think the wake turbulence exceeded the ability of the autopilot or pilot to correct. It spun about the longitudinal axis a few times before the pilot regained control. The report suggests that despite the correct corrective inputs the Challenger still spun out of control
    Presumably because the diameter of the wake vortex off an A380 would be greater than the wingspan of the challenger
    This was discussed previously I think?. But I can't find it.
    The wake is just one of the holes in the cheese. Looking at the graphs at the end of the report, and I'm pretty suspicious of the rudder input. A wake induced departure should have been relatively clean, in that the core isn't very big, and he was well out of it for about 99.9% of the event.

    Though as you say there have been instances of pilot inputs exacerbating the effects of WT :See AA587
    The way the controls were manipulated in that accident is right up there with AF447. Roll is a secondary effect of rudder...using it as the primary control in a normal situation is extraordinary. That's what the ailerons are for....
    juddles and Quickstatus like this.

  7. #5
    Member Shik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    126

    Re: A380 wake upset: business jet at 34,000ft, lost 8,700ft in 32s, plane written off

    Registered Users have the option of removing this
    and all other advertisements.  More


    Mock up video of the event under related videos of those links above https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJ8MJm8xWyY
    RAM likes this.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10th August 2012, 12:50 PM
  2. Plane change from A380 to 747
    By plegrand in forum Qantas Frequent Flyer Program
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 8th July 2011, 06:53 PM
  3. JetStar has lost my business!!
    By robbo10 in forum Qantas Frequent Flyer Program
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 21st May 2011, 04:33 PM
  4. Why you Shouldn't Upset AA FAs
    By drron in forum Travel News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24th July 2010, 08:29 AM
  5. 'Jinxed' Qantas plane replaced by A380
    By Slats7 in forum Travel News
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 8th September 2009, 01:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About Us

    The Australia Frequent Flyer is Australia's leading frequent flyer community and travel website.

    We are independently owned and not affiliated with any airline.

Follow us on

Twitter Facebook Google+ RSS


The Australian Frequent Flyer is a public forum. All posts reflect the personal opinion of the poster. These opinions are not necessarily shared by the Australian Frequent Flyer.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132