My first impression is... Ummm - it's air travel and $hit happens- at least you weren't blown up or didn't fall out of the sky - that's always a bonus.
My second impression is that in the main, your points were addressed:
At Rome airport we were boarded onto the aircraft where we sat for 20 minutes aboard before being told by the Captain that there was a 'minor security issue' causing our delay.
In this instance, the delay of 2 hours and 8 minutes was due to extra security checks requested by the local Airport Authorities.An announcement was made in Italian and also English some time later, advising we would be re-boarded soon.
A report from our Flight Purser confirms that an announcement was made to inform all passengers of the extra security check required to be conducted.Well they knew the delay was 2 hours and 8 minutes- so I'm guessing yes, they did read your letter. I couldn't pick up in there that your concern was regarding evacuation- a term not used in the original letter.Do they actually read the letters - my concern was not about on time performance but rather the lack of information and the way in which we were 'evacuated'
Maybe it wasn't clear what you were asking? Your last 3 paragraphs were statements.Why bother replying when the original letter was clearly not read or understood, it just makes the customer more annoyed.
Yep- refer QF. Nope- refer DJ.Do other airlines handle this the same (eg: am I dreaming to expect anything more professional).
No- from both points of view an announcement was made maybe I'm misreading the intent.Is the customer affairs person calling me a liar?
DYKWIA - much.As frequent flyers, we have never once been asked to exit an aircraft without any information as to why / how long we'd need to wait or what the cause of the disembarkation was.
... And those are my thoughts![]()





1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote
